Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: mathematics

Topic: T_D and complementation


view this post on Zulip Morgan Rogers (he/him) (Sep 24 2025 at 16:52):

I am cross-posting what ended up being a reference request on mathoverflow:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/500787/when-are-the-points-of-a-topological-space-complemented-as-sublocales

I discovered a (to me) surprising characterization of the TDT_D separation axiom as saying that singleton subspaces are complemented as sublocales. Has anyone seen this characterization? Have I made an obvious (or subtle) mistake in figuring this out?

view this post on Zulip Federica Pasqualone (Sep 25 2025 at 06:36):

Hi Morgan, if I am not mistaken there is some characterization in Chapter VI of Picado and Pultr (Frames and Locales, Topology without points, Birk.) pages 99-100 and Remark 1.2.1. In this chapter X is assumed to be T_0.

view this post on Zulip Morgan Rogers (he/him) (Sep 25 2025 at 08:16):

@Federica Pasqualone thanks, I've added that to the question, but it goes in the 'easy' direction 'TDT_D implies such-and-such' whereas I'm looking for a result in the other direction. An equivalent result would be that finite subspaces are complemented as sublocales. In fact, I think I could extend this to "countable subspaces are complemented as sublocales" using the localic Baire category theorem.

view this post on Zulip Federica Pasqualone (Sep 25 2025 at 09:01):

Glad to help! @Morgan Rogers (he/him) I read the book a long time ago, but there is also a last part to the remark 1.2.1 that may be of interest. Cit, "But the converse does not hold, that is, B=XAB = X \setminus A does not make generally B~\tilde{B} a complement of A~\tilde{A} Recall III.8.3: if both A and B are dense they meet at least B in BLB_L ."

view this post on Zulip Graham Manuell (Sep 25 2025 at 09:10):

@Morgan Rogers (he/him) I am not aware of the characterisation and from a quick look the proof seems fine to me.