You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Let be a nice symmeteic monoidal additive (1-)category. For any bialgebra object in the category inherits a monoidal strucure from , given by tensoring the underlying objects of two modules and then getting an induced action by the comultiplication of . My understanding is that any braided monoidal structure on is determined by the component of the braiding , and we can write down some simple conditions on such an endomorphism (reminiscent of the axioms of a braided monoidal category) which say that it induces a braided monoidal structure (and this all goes through for symmetric monoidal structures as well if we require the endomorphism to square to the identity).
Has anyone worked out the analogous result when we start with an -category? I guess I'm actually interested in a simpler question, which is if is a dg-bialgebra over some base commutative ring then what conditions do we need on a degree zero element of to induce a symmetric monoidal structure on the -category of modules? And to what extent can we reverse this process?
Even more specifically: if is a commutative noetherian ring and a sequence of elements in its jacobson radical then we can view the theory of local cohomology wrt as coming from a coreflective subcategory of "derived torsion" complexes in . This subcategory is equivalent to the category of modules over the endomorphism ring (as a dg algebra) of the koszul complex on . The coreflection endofunctor of is symmetric monoidal and so we can get a symmetric monoidal structure on the category of modules. Is this determined by some data internal to ?