You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Let be a functor (not assumed to be a fibration). Is there a common term for a morphism in such that for all the cartesian lift exists?
I don’t know of one in general, but in case we would say is carrable. So maybe -carrable?
carrable seems fine. Any explanation for why it's called that?
It's a synonym of "quarrable" in French, which means "quadrable", presumably because if a morphism is such, then we can form universal squares?
When writing in English, I think we should generally translate words into English. So maybe "-quadrable"?
Of course "quadrable" is a half-English, half-Latin version of the word "squarable". So you could use "squarable" too, and it would be even clearer that it has something to do with squares. (When I see "quadrable" it reminds of expressions like "solvable with quadratures", which means "integrable".)
But I don't really care - it's just another possibility.
There is a pretty substantial history of papers using "carrable" in English, but it does seem to mainly trace back to Francophone writers.
Interesting tidbit: I didn't realize till now that "square"'s etymology actually goes back to "quadra"! On reflection it doesn't look very germanic, but it's a bit sneaky to have dropped the "d".
I once thought I saw some evidence that "Descartes" is a shortening of "Des Quatres", thus explaining why he liked graph paper so much. But now I'm seeing a different story.
John Baez said:
Of course "quadrable" is a half-English, half-Latin version of the word "squarable".
True, but at least the Latin prefix "quadr-" is pretty well integrated into English already (quadratic, quadrilateral, quadruple, quadricep, quadrangle, quadricycle, ...). I don't think the same can be said for "carr-".
Definitely. Quadrable is to squarable as regal is to kingly. Kinda.
No, "quadrable" is to "squarable" as "regal" is to "royal", I think. The analogue of "kingly" would be something like "four-sides-able", which for some reason hasn't caught on.