Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: practice: terminology & notation

Topic: Morphisms for which all cartesian lifts exist


view this post on Zulip Max New (Nov 03 2025 at 16:05):

Let F:CDF : C \to D be a functor (not assumed to be a fibration). Is there a common term for a morphism f:xyf : x \to y in DD such that for all F(y^)=yF(\hat y) = y the cartesian lift fy^f^*\hat y exists?

view this post on Zulip Nathan Corbyn (Nov 03 2025 at 17:04):

I don’t know of one in general, but in case F=cod:DDF = \mathrm{cod} : \mathcal{D}^\to \to \mathcal{D} we would say ff is carrable. So maybe FF-carrable?

view this post on Zulip Max New (Nov 03 2025 at 17:40):

carrable seems fine. Any explanation for why it's called that?

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Nov 03 2025 at 17:58):

It's a synonym of "quarrable" in French, which means "quadrable", presumably because if a morphism is such, then we can form universal squares?

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Nov 08 2025 at 18:50):

When writing in English, I think we should generally translate words into English. So maybe "FF-quadrable"?

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Nov 09 2025 at 14:22):

Of course "quadrable" is a half-English, half-Latin version of the word "squarable". So you could use "squarable" too, and it would be even clearer that it has something to do with squares. (When I see "quadrable" it reminds of expressions like "solvable with quadratures", which means "integrable".)

But I don't really care - it's just another possibility.

view this post on Zulip Kevin Carlson (Nov 10 2025 at 18:59):

There is a pretty substantial history of papers using "carrable" in English, but it does seem to mainly trace back to Francophone writers.

view this post on Zulip Kevin Carlson (Nov 10 2025 at 19:00):

Interesting tidbit: I didn't realize till now that "square"'s etymology actually goes back to "quadra"! On reflection it doesn't look very germanic, but it's a bit sneaky to have dropped the "d".

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Nov 10 2025 at 22:00):

I once thought I saw some evidence that "Descartes" is a shortening of "Des Quatres", thus explaining why he liked graph paper so much. But now I'm seeing a different story.

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Nov 11 2025 at 07:31):

John Baez said:

Of course "quadrable" is a half-English, half-Latin version of the word "squarable".

True, but at least the Latin prefix "quadr-" is pretty well integrated into English already (quadratic, quadrilateral, quadruple, quadricep, quadrangle, quadricycle, ...). I don't think the same can be said for "carr-".

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Nov 11 2025 at 17:31):

Definitely. Quadrable is to squarable as regal is to kingly. Kinda.

view this post on Zulip Kevin Carlson (Nov 14 2025 at 19:05):

No, "quadrable" is to "squarable" as "regal" is to "royal", I think. The analogue of "kingly" would be something like "four-sides-able", which for some reason hasn't caught on.