You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
So I've got a category that is just like the category , but with more stuff (I'll call it ). An object in is a pair , where and , but an object in is a triple , where , something like a section.
A morphism in is a pair where , and .
A morphism is the pair above + the condition that .
Is there some known categorical semantics of this?
If we restrict our dependent type theory to the one with only erased types, then this recovers something like a "dependent twisted arrow category".
If we then additionally require this to be non-dependent (but still erased), then this recovers a bona-fide twisted arrow category.
That is, if and as functions are constant (I'll call the objects they're constant on and , overloading notation), then the sections from above turn into simple morphisms and .
The forward map stays the same , but the backward map is erased in , meaning it's defined by . This is exactly a morphism in .