You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I am reading a paper by Grandis and Pare, trying to understand their Conduche condition - "Lax Kan extensions between Double Categories".
I noticed the following generalization of their condition.
I want to know if there's a good way to think about this, or if anyone recognizes it. It's pretty simple so I am hoping someone recognizes it.
I am working in the 2 category Cat in what follows.
If is a span in Cat, by its 2-limit I mean a category with functors and natural transformations , , which is terminal among such cones.
Now say I have a square of functors connected by a 2 cell .
Then there is a canonical functor from the 2-limit of the span to the comma category of the cospan .
The Conduche condition I am interested in says that this induced functor between limit categories is surjective and has connected fibers. Perhaps it would be more natural to strengthen this to an equivalence so the limit of the span is equivalent to the limit of the cospan in a sense or an adjunction.
Anyway, this got me thinking. Is anything known about like, if you make some assumptions on the 2-cell , what can we conclude about this induced functor?
this kind of reminds me of dusko 's paper about viewing the beck Chevalley condition as a kind of interpolation condition. I feel like his paper involves a condition very similar to this, this is related to uniform interpolation
@dusko Do you have any comments? Have you run into other situations where this interpolation condition comes up?
Yooooo this might be what i need - https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/exact+square
I have added this realization to the page on the Conduche condition. Cool
Patrick Nicodemus has marked this topic as resolved.
What follows is some people testing what they can do after a topic has been "resolved":
posting a comment to the request of @John Baez . I hope this helps.
Thanks!
Todd Trimble has marked this topic as unresolved.
From what I thought I understood from before, some time has to elapse before the inability of ordinary users to unresolve kicks in.
It turns out that anyone can post to a resolved comment no matter how long it's been resolved.