You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
If is a category with finite limits then there is a bicategory of "split spans". A 1-cell in the bicategory of split spans from to is an object equipped with , with .
Unit and Composition extends the unit and composition of spans. A 2-cell is a map of spans respecting the splitting.
Anybody see this before?
Similarly there should be a pseudo double category of objects, morphisms and split spans.
Intuitively if spans are generalized relations then these things are generalized total relations, they come with a function witnessing that the relation is total.
Hm. Intuitively the property seems like it might be desirable for some arguments, but it doesn't appear to be necessary anywhere. On the other hand if you do want to assume this, it should be a sub-bicategory.
If spans are "bigraded sets" then spans satisfying this property are only trivially bigraded, as one grading is a refinement of another.
Here's why I think this is an interesting notion. Consider the bicategory of sets and spans. Let be a category and let be a lax functor. So associates to each a set and to each a family of sets for . These relations are reflexive, so is true for every , and transitive, so .
If , then to prove a relation is "total valued" is to give an element of .
If we want to prove this for all , there are natural coherence conditions that should be respected associated to the identity and composition of the category, and this entails that we lift the functor to the bicategory of split spans.
For example, there is a functor sending each to and to . has a left adjoint iff is a total-valued relation, i.e., if there is an element of . If we have a diagram in , then we can lift it to the bicategory of split spans iff it is possible to choose a left adjoint for each functor in the diagram in a way that is compatible with composition on-the-nose.
As another example, let be a Grothendieck fibration, and let be the lax functor which sends to and for ,, is the set of Cartesian arrows from to over .
Giving a lift of this lax functor to the bicategory of split spans is equivalent to choosing a splitting for the fibration.
Hi @Patrick Nicodemus , I have studied this double category of "split spans" in Chapter 4 of my PhD thesis. There I called them "split multi-valued functions". It arises as the left-connected completion of the double category of spans.
Sweet, thank you very much. Interesting! I'll check it out.
The main goal of that work was construct a double category which "classifies" the notion of delta lens. Lax functors are the same as delta lenses .
Alright, very nice, that will give me somewhere to start.
Just for the sake of discussion, I am interested in studying the three dimensional version of this concept where the double category of spans is replaced with the intercategory of spans https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022404916301256
There are some talk slides (here, here, here) that I gave on this construction too.
Oh, good. Thank you.
I've alluded to this in previous threads but "lifting data" between morphisms of a category carries some kind of three dimensional structure
Patrick Nicodemus said:
Just for the sake of discussion, I am interested in studying the three dimensional version of this concept where the double category of spans is replaced with the intercategory of spans https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022404916301256
That sounds interesting! If you have something concrete you'd like to discuss, please feel welcome to contact me by email.
Ok, great. I really appreciate that. Once i get a chance to write down some relatively clean initial thoughts I may send them along.
Bryce Clarke said:
I have studied this double category of "split spans" in Chapter 4 of my [PhD thesis]
This sounds interesting, would you mind posting the thesis here? I currently have some difficulties with the download from behind the Chinese firewall, even with Tor.
(Background: taking a 1-categorical version of this construction gives a construction of Markov categories which reproduces some standard examples.)
Tobias Fritz said:
Bryce Clarke said:
I have studied this double category of "split spans" in Chapter 4 of my [PhD thesis]
This sounds interesting, would you mind posting the thesis here? I currently have some difficulties with the download from behind the Chinese firewall, even with Tor.