You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Hi, I was wondering if there is a standard name/concept for the following construction: given a diagram and an object , I define a "weak" cone under to be a functor such that 1) and 2) morphisms are just postcomposition by : .
Then a cone is just a "weak" cone where every is a singleton. Or, conversely, a "weak" cone is a cone where the "arms" of the cone are no longer unique.
I would be very interested if this has been used somewhere else!
Erf I'm sorry I didn't see there's #learning: id my structure entirely dedicated to this kind of questions—better to move the topic there maybe
Moved :+1:
Let's see ... this is the same as a subfunctor of . In it's a sieve (or is it cosieve?).
Moana Jubert said:
Hi, I was wondering if there is a standard name/concept for the following construction: given a diagram and an object , I define a "weak" cone under to be a functor such that 1) and 2) morphisms are just postcomposition by : .
Then a cone is just a "weak" cone where every is a singleton. Or, conversely, a "weak" cone is a cone where the "arms" of the cone are no longer unique.
I would be very interested if this has been used somewhere else!
this is very close to what is called a "weighted" cone, and the analogous notion of limit is called a weighted limit.
James points out that this is a subfunctor . In general, for a weighted cone, need not be a subfunctor, but it can be an arbitrary presheaf, and can be an arbitrary natural transformation.
Or in other words, instead of , we have a map , and this reduces to your situation when we have injective.
The notion of weighted limit is essential in enriched category theory, where ordinary limits often cannot be defined.
Of course! This looks promising. Thank you!