Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: deprecated: id my structure

Topic: "Weak" cones


view this post on Zulip Moana Jubert (Aug 12 2023 at 14:04):

Hi, I was wondering if there is a standard name/concept for the following construction: given a diagram D:ICD : \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{C} and an object cCc \in \mathcal{C}, I define a "weak" cone under cc to be a functor W:ISetW : \mathcal{I} \to \mathbf{Set} such that 1) WiHomC(c,Di)W_i \subseteq \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(c, D_i) and 2) morphisms Wf:WiWjW_f : W_i \to W_j are just postcomposition by DfD_f : ϕWiDfϕWj\phi \in W_i \mapsto D_f \circ \phi \in W_j.

Then a cone is just a "weak" cone where every WiW_i is a singleton. Or, conversely, a "weak" cone is a cone where the "arms" of the cone are no longer unique.

I would be very interested if this has been used somewhere else!

view this post on Zulip Moana Jubert (Aug 12 2023 at 19:50):

Erf I'm sorry I didn't see there's #learning: id my structure entirely dedicated to this kind of questions—better to move the topic there maybe

view this post on Zulip Morgan Rogers (he/him) (Aug 12 2023 at 19:52):

Moved :+1:

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (Aug 12 2023 at 20:15):

Let's see ... this is the same as a subfunctor of HomC(c,D)\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(c,D-). In cDc \downarrow D it's a sieve (or is it cosieve?).

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Aug 13 2023 at 04:55):

Moana Jubert said:

Hi, I was wondering if there is a standard name/concept for the following construction: given a diagram D:ICD : \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{C} and an object cCc \in \mathcal{C}, I define a "weak" cone under cc to be a functor W:ISetW : \mathcal{I} \to \mathbf{Set} such that 1) WiHomC(c,Di)W_i \subseteq \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(c, D_i) and 2) morphisms Wf:WiWjW_f : W_i \to W_j are just postcomposition by DfD_f : ϕWiDfϕWj\phi \in W_i \mapsto D_f \circ \phi \in W_j.

Then a cone is just a "weak" cone where every WiW_i is a singleton. Or, conversely, a "weak" cone is a cone where the "arms" of the cone are no longer unique.

I would be very interested if this has been used somewhere else!

this is very close to what is called a "weighted" cone, and the analogous notion of limit is called a weighted limit.

James points out that this is a subfunctor m:PHomC(c,D()m: P \to Hom_C(c,D(-). In general, for a weighted cone, PP need not be a subfunctor, but it can be an arbitrary presheaf, and mm can be an arbitrary natural transformation.

Or in other words, instead of WiHomC(c,Di)W_i\subset Hom_C(c,D_i), we have a map fi:WiHomC(c,Di)f_i : W_i \to Hom_C(c,D_i), and this reduces to your situation when we have fif_i injective.

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Aug 13 2023 at 05:01):

The notion of weighted limit is essential in enriched category theory, where ordinary limits often cannot be defined.

view this post on Zulip Moana Jubert (Aug 13 2023 at 07:38):

Of course! This looks promising. Thank you!