You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Have any of you all come across exterior differential systems before? https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4613-9714-4
Seems like a very interesting generalization of ordinary and partial differential equations.
I stumbled across this stuff when learning about exterior calculus but never dug into it. Looks interesting though.
That makes sense that it came up w.r.t. exterior calculus.
I particularly like the condition that the ideal be closed under differentiation, because it makes a lot of sense. I.e., if you have some relation , then you definitely also want .
Actually, just straight away I think we have a category here that is interesting. The objects are manifolds, and a morphism between the spaces and is an ideal of . Given an ideal and an ideal , I think we can make an ideal of by taking... as an ideal of and then projecting down?? Something like that.
I need to work out an example.
If is generated by , and is generated by , then should be generated by . Which is something that is in . I think instead of projecting down, we take the inverse image from the map . There's some double contravariance going on here: the natural map induces a map , which in turn induces a map from ideals of to ideals of
OK, and I'm pretty sure this is a symmetric monoidal category! The monoidal product is the cartesian product of manifolds (which is not the categorical product in this category)
Neato!
Hey, if we use the graded ring of discrete exterior forms, this might even be useful to GATEM!
Nice! Yeah, it would be cool if we could compose up a meaningful PDE using this category.
Is the category really cartesian though? It seems more relational in character to me.
Oh, you are totally right
It's monoidal using the cartesian product of manifolds, but that's definitely not the categorical product in this category
Evan Patterson said:
Nice! Yeah, it would be cool if we could compose up a meaningful PDE using this category.
Hmmmm, one meaningful PDE coming up!
OK, first of all, I think I messed up with the definition. I think the morphisms should be ideals of , where that is the direct sum of graded rings. This is important, because there are morphisms , and morphisms , which means that we can transfer ideals in both directions, which is necessary for composition.
OK, I have some harebrained example for what this means, but I think it's too harebrained to inflict on the world for now...
Gotta actually work out some math before I confuse everything with a bunch of false statements
Some of this stuff can be seen as algebra: that is, the study of dgas, meaning differential graded algebras. Differential forms on a manifold form a dga, and there's a sort of obvious concept of 'ideal' for dgas, which may be called a 'differential graded ideal': you can mod out a dga by a differential graded ideal and get a dga.
There's a huge amount of math about dgas, only a tiny bit of which can be found on the link. If you're mainly interested in differential forms, then you want 'commutative' dgas, where
where has grade and has grade . These act a lot like commutative rings: e.g. you don't need to worry about the different between left, right and two-sided ideals.
Ideals being closed under differentiation seems to be the right notion for a lot of things. From the geometrical perspective, they are linked to involutive distributions, that is, the one that are (thanks to Frobenius' theorem) integrable.