Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: deprecated: thermodynamics

Topic: exterior differential systems


view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 16:50):

Have any of you all come across exterior differential systems before? https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4613-9714-4

Seems like a very interesting generalization of ordinary and partial differential equations.

view this post on Zulip Evan Patterson (Dec 04 2021 at 21:10):

I stumbled across this stuff when learning about exterior calculus but never dug into it. Looks interesting though.

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:12):

That makes sense that it came up w.r.t. exterior calculus.

I particularly like the condition that the ideal be closed under differentiation, because it makes a lot of sense. I.e., if you have some relation X=YX=Y, then you definitely also want X˙=Y˙\dot{X} = \dot{Y}.

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:17):

Actually, just straight away I think we have a category here that is interesting. The objects are manifolds, and a morphism between the spaces XX and YY is an ideal of Ω(X×Y)\Omega^\ast(X \times Y). Given an ideal IΩ(X×Y)I \subset \Omega^\ast(X \times Y) and an ideal JΩ(Y×Z)J \subset \Omega^\ast(Y \times Z), I think we can make an ideal of Ω(X×Z)\Omega^\ast(X \times Z) by taking... I+JI+J as an ideal of Ω(X×Y×Z)\Omega^\ast(X \times Y \times Z) and then projecting down?? Something like that.

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:19):

I need to work out an example.

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:24):

If II is generated by dxdydx - dy, and JJ is generated by dydzdy - dz, then JIJ \circ I should be generated by dxdzdx - dz. Which is something that is in I+JI+J. I think instead of projecting down, we take the inverse image from the map Ω(X×Z)Ω(X×Y×Z)\Omega^\ast(X \times Z) \to \Omega^\ast(X \times Y \times Z). There's some double contravariance going on here: the natural map X×Y×ZX×ZX \times Y \times Z \to X \times Z induces a map Ω(X×Z)Ω(X×Y×Z)\Omega^\ast(X \times Z) \to \Omega^\ast(X \times Y \times Z), which in turn induces a map from ideals of Ω(X×Y×Z)\Omega^\ast(X \times Y \times Z) to ideals of Ω(X×Z)\Omega^\ast(X \times Z)

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:25):

OK, and I'm pretty sure this is a symmetric monoidal category! The monoidal product is the cartesian product of manifolds (which is not the categorical product in this category)

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:25):

Neato!

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:26):

Hey, if we use the graded ring of discrete exterior forms, this might even be useful to GATEM!

view this post on Zulip Evan Patterson (Dec 04 2021 at 21:28):

Nice! Yeah, it would be cool if we could compose up a meaningful PDE using this category.

view this post on Zulip Evan Patterson (Dec 04 2021 at 21:29):

Is the category really cartesian though? It seems more relational in character to me.

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:29):

Oh, you are totally right

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:29):

It's monoidal using the cartesian product of manifolds, but that's definitely not the categorical product in this category

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:32):

Evan Patterson said:

Nice! Yeah, it would be cool if we could compose up a meaningful PDE using this category.

Hmmmm, one meaningful PDE coming up!

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:47):

OK, first of all, I think I messed up with the definition. I think the morphisms should be ideals of Ω(X)Ω(Y)\Omega^\ast(X) \oplus \Omega^\ast(Y), where that \oplus is the direct sum of graded rings. This is important, because there are morphisms ABAA \oplus B \to A, and morphisms AABA \to A \oplus B, which means that we can transfer ideals in both directions, which is necessary for composition.

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:54):

OK, I have some harebrained example for what this means, but I think it's too harebrained to inflict on the world for now...

view this post on Zulip Owen Lynch (Dec 04 2021 at 21:54):

Gotta actually work out some math before I confuse everything with a bunch of false statements

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Dec 04 2021 at 22:34):

Some of this stuff can be seen as algebra: that is, the study of dgas, meaning differential graded algebras. Differential forms on a manifold form a dga, and there's a sort of obvious concept of 'ideal' for dgas, which may be called a 'differential graded ideal': you can mod out a dga by a differential graded ideal and get a dga.

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Dec 04 2021 at 22:36):

There's a huge amount of math about dgas, only a tiny bit of which can be found on the link. If you're mainly interested in differential forms, then you want 'commutative' dgas, where

μν=(1)pqνμ\mu \wedge \nu = (-1)^{pq} \nu \wedge \mu

where μ\mu has grade pp and ν\nu has grade qq. These act a lot like commutative rings: e.g. you don't need to worry about the different between left, right and two-sided ideals.

view this post on Zulip Paolo Perrone (Dec 06 2021 at 10:46):

Ideals being closed under differentiation seems to be the right notion for a lot of things. From the geometrical perspective, they are linked to involutive distributions, that is, the one that are (thanks to Frobenius' theorem) integrable.