You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Stream created by John Baez.
This is a thread for discussing the use of categories, operads and the like in thermodynamics. I expect that most of the time it'll be just me and @Owen Lynch talking about these topics: he's doing his master's thesis at the University of Utrecht on 'compositional thermodynamics'.
Next time we meet, I hope:
@Owen Lynch can explain some of Caratheodory's work to me. Hey, Owen, can you point me to that long paper of his again? I'm not finding it.
I can explain some of Simon Willerton's ideas on the Legendre-Fenchel transform. Notice that he uses categories enriched over ! This is a good sign that our first paper was on the right track.
Here's the Caratheodory paper: http://neo-classical-physics.info/uploads/3/0/6/5/3065888/caratheodory_-_thermodynamics.pdf
Thanks!
John Baez said:
This is a thread for discussing the use of categories, operads and the like in thermodynamics. I expect that most of the time it'll be just me and Owen Lynch talking about these topics: he's doing his master's thesis at the University of Utrecht on 'compositional thermodynamics'.
In my opinion this is a strong candidate to be a topic in the #practice: applied ct stream, and not a stream in its own right. (I've unfollowed virtually all "single topic" streams that people have created over time)
The stated expected use would lead me to agree, but perhaps thermodynamics is a broader subject than I appreciate so that there are lots of potential topics here.
I imagine we're going to want to spawn a lot of sub-topics here, so we can keep straight all the topics Owen I discuss for his thesis in the next year. Also I may start a Zoom discussion series with the biochemist Hong Qian. It would be great if topics could have sub-topics, but they can't.
I promise to write large numbers of comments here in the next year, on many topics. Jules can unfollow this stream.
By the way: anyone who wants to comment on this stream should feel free to!
That should go without saying. But one reason Owen and I are talking here rather than privately is so other people can join in and maybe help out now and then.
As a philosophical interest, I'd love to be able to listen to a lecture at some point, when the concepts are settled a bit, that would explain the relation between entropy and negentropy in categorical terms.
Does anyone have any experience or know of any applications applying category theory to fluid dynamics? I'm recently looking into some problems involved in this field, and was wondering if there are any categorical perspectives on it
yes! @James Fairbanks and @Evan Patterson are using Catlab to do computational fluid dynamics.
@Evan Patterson is working on a categorification of the discrete exterior calculus for this effort.
Owen is using "categorification" to mean "applying categories to something", not "replacing set-theoretic concepts by their category-theoretic analogues". I try to force people to use it the latter way.
Thanks for the mention, Owen. My collaborators and I have indeed been working on categorical approaches to computational physics, with fluid dynamics being one of the main examples. I said a bit about this work in the second half of a talk I gave earlier this month, but unfortunately that's all we have out there so far. One of my main priorities early next year will be writing some papers about this work.
Slides and video for my talk this week at the @ToposInstitute colloquium: https://www.algebraicjulia.org/assets/slides/topos-colloquium-2021.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra-PLnog_M0 The talk had two mostly unrelated parts.
- Evan Patterson (@ejpatters)