You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Hello, I’m Jason Parker, and I’m just starting my third year as a postdoctoral fellow working with Rory Lucyshyn-Wright at Brandon University in Canada (as I mentioned in my introduction post!). I’d like to describe some of my past, current, and future research in this stream; hopefully these initial posts are not too long!
Since working with Rory Lucyshyn-Wright, my research has primarily turned to enriched algebraic theories and enriched monads. Overall, we’ve been working to extend much of the previous literature on these topics to a much more general setting. Here’s the basic setup: you start with a symmetric monoidal closed category , a -category , and a full dense subcategory , which is called a subcategory of arities. In the classical context of finitary universal algebra, you have and , the full subcategory of consisting of the finite cardinals. The objects of are your “arities”, which you can use to define enriched algebraic structure on objects of the -category . In most of the previous literature on enriched algebra relative to a subcategory of arities, has been taken to be a locally (finitely) presentable closed category and a locally (finitely) presentable -category. Here's what we’ve been working on:
The results of our preprint are somewhat theoretical, and are not necessarily easily used in practice to explicitly construct enriched monads. In this preprint we use the results of the former preprint as a theoretical underpinning to show that when is a subcategory of arities satisfying the conditions of this preprint, then we obtain very practical and flexible methods for explicitly describing enriched -ary -monads on , using notions of enriched operations and enriched equations akin to those from classical universal algebra. Rory gave a talk about this work at ACT 2022.
There have been many correspondences established in the literature between enriched monads and enriched algebraic theories of some kind. We have the classical Lawvere-Linton equivalence between Lawvere theories and finitary monads on , which was subsequently generalized and enriched by Power and Nishizawa (see here and here) to an equivalence between enriched Lawvere theories and finitary -monads on a locally finitely presentable -category enriched over a locally finitely presentable closed category . Rory Lucyshyn-Wright subsequently showed in this paper that when is an eleutheric system of arities in an essentially arbitrary symmetric monoidal closed category , then one obtains an equivalence between -theories and -ary -monads on . Recently, Bourke and Garner showed in this paper that when is an arbitrary small subcategory of arities in a locally presentable -category enriched over a locally presentable closed category , then one obtains an equivalence between -theories and -nervous -monads on . Rory and I are currently finishing a paper, to be titled "Enriched structure-semantics adjunctions and monad-theory equivalences for subcategories of arities", in which we show that all of these enriched monad-theory correspondences can be obtained as particular instances of a general result, which also yields new examples. Specifically, we have shown that if is an essentially arbitrary symmetric monoidal closed category and is an amenable subcategory of arities in a -category , which basically means that all -theories admit free algebras, then there is an equivalence between -theories and -nervous -monads on . This result specializes to recover all of the enriched monad-theory equivalences mentioned above (and more). Moreover, we obtain the new result that when is an arbitrary small subcategory of arities in a -sketchable -category enriched over a locally bounded closed category , then is automatically amenable. In particular, we may take , and obtain an enriched monad-theory equivalence for any small subcategory of arities in a locally bounded closed category , including many convenient categories of topological spaces. I gave a talk on this material at ACT 2022.
We are also working on extending most of the main results and techniques of this paper and this paper to the more general context that I just discussed, which will in particular allow us to easily present -nervous -monads on locally bounded closed categories for arbitrary small subcategories of arities .
We have a few other projects/papers in the pipeline as well, but these are the main ones that we’ve been working on.
My paper “Presentations and algebraic colimits of enriched monads for a subcategory of arities” with Rory Lucyshyn-Wright was published in TAC this week. As I discuss in a bit more detail above, in this paper we show that many results about free monads, presentations of monads, and colimits of monads established by Kelly, Power, and Lack (and other authors) can be recovered as instances of a general axiomatic setting, namely that of a bounded and eleutheric subcategory of arities. Here are some slides (from Category Theory Octoberfest 2021) that summarize the paper.
In the follow-up preprint “Diagrammatic presentations of enriched monads and varieties for a subcategory of arities”, we work in the same setting and show how to provide extremely explicit and user-friendly presentations of enriched monads.
I have a new preprint on the arXiv, titled "Free algebras of topologically enriched multi-sorted equational theories". The quick summary is that I develop a topologically enriched generalization of classical multi-sorted equational theories, and I establish explicit and concrete descriptions of free algebras for these enriched equational theories. This work is closely connected to recent work by myself, Lucyshyn-Wright, and many others on enriched algebraic theories and their presentations. But here's the full abstract:
Classical multi-sorted equational theories and their free algebras have been fundamental in mathematics and computer science. In this paper, we present a generalization of multi-sorted equational theories from the classical (Set-enriched) context to the context of enrichment in a symmetric monoidal category V that is topological over Set. Prominent examples of such categories include: various categories of topological and measurable spaces; the categories of models of relational Horn theories without equality, including the categories of preordered sets and (extended) pseudo-metric spaces; and the categories of quasispaces (a.k.a. concrete sheaves) on concrete sites, which have recently attracted interest in the study of programming language semantics.
Given such a category V, we define a notion of V-enriched multi-sorted equational theory. We show that every V-enriched multi-sorted equational theory T has an underlying classical multi-sorted equational theory |T|, and that free T-algebras may be obtained as suitable liftings of free |T|-algebras. We establish explicit and concrete descriptions of free T-algebras, which have a convenient inductive character when V is cartesian closed. We provide several examples of V-enriched multi-sorted equational theories, and we also discuss the close connection between these theories and the presentations of V-enriched algebraic theories and monads studied in recent papers by the author and Lucyshyn-Wright.
I've given a few conference talks on this work this summer, including at ACT; here are the slides for that one. Comments are very welcome!