Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: deprecated: mathematics

Topic: The closure functor


view this post on Zulip Jean-Baptiste Vienney (Jun 12 2023 at 17:59):

Let BoundedBounded be the category whose objects are bounded subsets of euclidean spaces Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} for any n1n \ge 1 and whose morphisms are Lipschitz continuous functions. For every ABoundedA \in Bounded, A\overline{A} is a closed and bounded metric space with the induced distance, thus compact and thus complete.

Let f:ABf:A \rightarrow B, and xAx \in \overline{A}, let (xn)n0(x_{n})_{n \ge 0} be a sequence of points of AA which converges to xx in A\overline{A}.

For every n,p0n,p \ge 0, we have that d(f(xn),f(xp))K.d(xn,xp)d(f(x_{n}),f(x_{p})) \le K.d(x_{n},x_{p}) where K0K \ge 0 is the Lipschitz constant of ff. (xn)n0(x_{n})_{n \ge 0} is a convergent sequence in A\overline{A} and thus a Cauchy sequence in A\overline{A} and thus a Cauchy sequence in AA. It follows from this inequality that (f(xn))n0(f(x_{n}))_{n \ge 0} is also a Cauchy sequence in BB and thus a Cauchy sequence in B\overline{B} and thus converges in B\overline{B} because it is complete. Moreover this limit doesn't depend on the choice of sequence (xn)n0(x_{n})_{n \ge 0}. We can thus write it f(x)B\overline{f}(x) \in \overline{B} as it only depends on xx. We then obtain a function f:AB\overline{f}:\overline{A} \rightarrow \overline{B} that we can show is continuous.

I believe that we obtain a closure functor .ˉ:BoundedBounded\bar{.}:Bounded \rightarrow Bounded. It looks like a very useful functor -- people who use applied functional analysis use the type of reasoning described above everyday but it would probably be easier for them if they could directly use such functors instead of redoing this kind of proofs all the time. I didn't find references about this. There is a book Topology: A Categorical Approach but it is not that much categorical.

view this post on Zulip Jean-Baptiste Vienney (Jun 12 2023 at 18:07):

If anybody knows a reference, please tell me. Otherwise I believe it could make a nice half-page paper.

view this post on Zulip Jean-Baptiste Vienney (Jun 12 2023 at 18:15):

Some years ago, my first research project was with a prof working in functional analysis and on such things as fluid mechanics and the Navier-Stokes equation. I was doing such reasoning like this all the time with her. I could ask her about this functor! I think she knows nothing about category theory, but she could maybe be excited to know learn that this thing is a functor!

view this post on Zulip Jean-Baptiste Vienney (Jun 12 2023 at 18:25):

But maybe it is something basic in modal logic where they have closure operators like this?

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Jun 12 2023 at 18:28):

Is this "just" the completion functor on metric spaces, restricted to bounded subsets of Rn\mathbb{R}^n?

view this post on Zulip Jean-Baptiste Vienney (Jun 12 2023 at 18:31):

Probably yes, I just take the closure of a bounded subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} and it gives a complete metric space .

view this post on Zulip Jean-Baptiste Vienney (Jun 12 2023 at 18:32):

So that's nothing more than that I guess.

view this post on Zulip Jean-Baptiste Vienney (Jun 12 2023 at 18:33):

Hmm I don't know because I need Lipschitz functions.

view this post on Zulip Jean-Baptiste Vienney (Jun 12 2023 at 18:33):

I don't see how you could extend your function without it being Lipschitz?

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Jun 12 2023 at 18:41):

Well, you could just take the category of metric spaces and Lipschitz maps, if you want your category to be a full subcategory of it. But it suffices to use uniformly continuous maps (in which case you can also generalize the objects to [[uniform spaces]]).

view this post on Zulip Jean-Baptiste Vienney (Jun 12 2023 at 18:46):

Ok perfect, I've found a paper which talk about a completion functor. So I'm happy to know about this functor which is already well-known!