You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Given an operad in a sym. mon. closed category we can study their algebras, given by operad morphisms for $$X\in $C$$. Here is the operad .
A fundamental theorem states that has an associated monad such that the algebras coincide: .
One apparent benefit of looking at operads instead of the induced monad is that we can also study coalgebras over the operad .
These are given by operad morphisms given by .
[do not confuse the coalgebras of with the coalgebras of the opposite cooperad in the opposite category . These are different!]
My question is whether there is a sensible notion of coalgebra for (more) general non-operadic monads ?
[My monad is probably monoidal, and also has algebra maps . ]
[Certainly, we can look at the underlying endofunctor of and consider coalgebras for that functor. However, I don't think this recovers the right notion of coalgebra. Indeed, for the symmetric algebra monad on this gives coalgebras which don't neccesarily satisfy any of the coalgebra laws like coassociativity]
Alexander Gietelink Oldenziel said:
Given an operad in a sym. mon. closed category we can study their algebras, given by operad morphisms for . Here is the operad .
A fundamental theorem states that has an associated monad such that the algebras coincide: .
Don't you need some extra condition, like being cocomplete, for this to work?
Say is the category of finite sets with its monoidal structure. Then I think there's an operad whose algebras are monoids in - that is, finite monoids. But I don't think there's a "free finite monoid" on a finite set, so I don't think there's a monad whose algebras are finite monoids.
By the way, I'd really like to know a reference for this "fundamental theorem".
I know Todd Trimble has proved something similar:
See Theorem 1.3. I needed this result in my work... that's why I'm interested in references!