You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
A long time ago I read about an attempt to understand quarks using what I'll call "defective" monoidal categories: things like monoidal categories where the associator doesn't obey the pentagon identity.
At the time I wasn't interested - mainly because we already have a good theory of quarks.
However, now that I'm writing about the history of monoidal categories, I'd be interested to see attempts, no matter how flawed, to do something interesting with defective monoidal categories.
And so far I'm not finding that paper I'd seen!
Does anyone know about anything like this?
Any pictures you can show us of what you remember?
Sorry, not really. My memories are quite vague, but idea was roughly that instead of the usual idea that quarks are described via the tautologous representation of color on , they are described by an object in a "defective monoidal category" (my own term just now, meaning something like a monoidal category where the pentagon identity doesn't hold). Somehow this was supposed to explain confinement (the fact that we only see particles that transform in the trivial rep of , like mesons and hadrons). However, I don't think the details were worked out enough to be convincing to me, especially since the usual theory works great.
The folks involved wanted me to visit them and talk about this, but I refused. I don't think I should name them because I may have the details mixed up, and I haven't been able to find any such paper written by the people who I thought had this idea.
(Or any such paper at all, for that matter.)
This is just one of several, probably quite a few, nonstandard theories attempting to explain color and confinement.