Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: deprecated: discrete geometry and entanglement

Topic: Commuting diagrams


view this post on Zulip Eric Forgy (Dec 19 2020 at 05:41):

I made a mistake (imagine that!) :sweat_smile:

I said that the first-order calculus can be summarized by the commuting diagram

image.png

That is wrong. Instead, we need two separate commuting diagrams

20201218_213822.jpg

view this post on Zulip Eric Forgy (Dec 19 2020 at 05:54):

It seemed natural to me to try to combine things but if I put the two diagrams together and claim the whole thing is commutative, then I force some things to be isomorphisms that aren't isomorphisms.

view this post on Zulip Eric Forgy (Dec 19 2020 at 09:28):

I think I found a way to extend this to Ω~2\tilde\Omega^2 via

20201219_012348.jpg

The literature, e.g. here, says Ω~2=Ω~1AΩ~1\tilde\Omega^2 = \tilde\Omega^1\otimes_A\tilde\Omega^1, but I am not sure if that is correct :thinking:

I think Ω~2\tilde\Omega^2 is a sub-bimodule of Ω~1AΩ~1.\tilde\Omega^1\otimes_A\tilde\Omega^1.

view this post on Zulip Eric Forgy (Dec 19 2020 at 09:36):

The map μ1:AKAKAAKA\mu_1:A\otimes_K A\otimes_K A\to A\otimes_K A is a bimodule morphism that acts on basis elements by "popping out the middle", i.e.

eiKejKekeiKeke^i\otimes_K e^j\otimes_K e^k \mapsto e^i\otimes_K e^k

and extends linearly to all of AK3,A^{\otimes_K 3}, i.e.

μ1(α)=i,j,kα(i,j,k)μ1(eiKejKek)=i,k[jα(i,j,k)]eiKek.\mu_1(\alpha) = \sum_{i,j,k} \alpha(i,j,k) \mu_1(e^i\otimes_K e^j\otimes_K e^k) = \sum_{i,k} \left[\sum_j \alpha(i,j,k)\right] e^i\otimes_K e^k.

view this post on Zulip Eric Forgy (Dec 19 2020 at 09:38):

If f,gAf,g\in A, then clearly

μ1(fαg)=fμ1(α)g.\mu_1(f\,\alpha\, g) = f\,\mu_1(\alpha)\, g.

view this post on Zulip Eric Forgy (Dec 19 2020 at 10:04):

I think Ω~2\tilde\Omega^2 should be the kernel of μ1m:Ω~1AΩ1AKA.\mu_1\circ m: \tilde\Omega^1\otimes_A\Omega^1\to A\otimes_K A.

Let α,βΩ~1\alpha,\beta\in\tilde\Omega^1 so that

αAβ=(i,j)(k,l)α(i,j)β(k,l)(eiKej)A(ekKel)=(i,j)(k,l)α(i,j)β(k,l)δj,k(eiKej)A(ejKel)=(i,j,k)α(i,j)β(j,k)(eiKej)A(ejKek),\begin{aligned} \alpha\otimes_A\beta &= \sum_{(i,j)}\sum_{(k,l)} \alpha(i,j) \beta(k,l) (e^i\otimes_K e^j) \otimes_A (e^k\otimes_K e^l) \\ &= \sum_{(i,j)}\sum_{(k,l)} \alpha(i,j) \beta(k,l) \delta^{j,k} (e^i\otimes_K e^j) \otimes_A (e^j\otimes_K e^l) \\ &= \sum_{(i,j,k)} \alpha(i,j) \beta(j,k) (e^i\otimes_K e^j) \otimes_A (e^j\otimes_K e^k), \end{aligned}

where (i,j,k)(i,j,k) is a length two path ijki\to j\to k and

m(αAβ)=(i,j,k)α(i,j)β(j,k)eiKejKek.m\left(\alpha\otimes_A\beta\right)= \sum_{(i,j,k)} \alpha(i,j) \beta(j,k) e^i\otimes_K e^j \otimes_K e^k.

so that

μ1m(αAβ)=(i,,k)[jα(i,j)β(j,k)]eiKek.\mu_1\circ m\left(\alpha\otimes_A\beta\right)= \sum_{(i,-,k)} \left[\sum_j \alpha(i,j) \beta(j,k)\right] e^i\otimes_K e^k.

This is zero when

jα(i,j)β(j,k)=0.\sum_j \alpha(i,j) \beta(j,k) = 0.