You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Hello everyone,
I just posted the new preprint Operads as double functors,
which may be partly considered as an indexed (instead of fibered) version of the previous Fibered multicategory theory.
The main achievement is the characterization of colored operads (that is, symmetric multicategories)
as product-preserving double (lax) functors from the opposite of the double category of pullback squares in finite sets
to the double category of mappings and spans in sets;
or, equivalently, as normal product-preserving double (lax) functors from the same double category
to that of functors and profunctors.
This may be seen as a generalization of the characterization of commutative monoids
as product-preserving double functors from the opposite of the double category of pullback squares in finite sets
to the double category of squares in sets.
This view suggests the concept of generalized operad (and of generalized commutative monoid)
obtained by replacing, in the above, the category of finite sets with any category C.
For instance, if A is a category with small products (or sums) one gets a generalized operad with C = Set,
and by taking its isomorphism classes one gets the corresponding generalized monoid.
I'm looking forward to receiving your feedback!
Does this perspective shed any light on two-sided multicategory-like structures such as polycategories or props?
I'm not sure, but I think that product-preserving double (lax) functors from the opposite of the double category Ref_f
(of mappings and relations on finite sets) to Span(Set), should indeed capture some natural kind of two-sided multicategory-like structure.