You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Me, @fosco and @Daniele Palombi just put a new thing on the arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06234
It is a paper about extensions of Petri nets for biological processes. The applications of the paper per sé are not that interesting. What is interesting is that this paper is the continuation of a paper I had with @David Spivak about a year ago that provided a categorical semantics for Guarded Nets (arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02762) It turns out that that paper was only the tip of the iceberg, and that we can caracterize a lot of interesting extensions of Petri nets by studying lax functors , with free (commutative,symmetric) monoidal.
In this paper, we are able to endow tokens with properties describing the global behavior of the net they live in. Using laxity, we can then merge the local knowledge that each token has into a global thing.
If you are lazy and don't wanna read I also made a video presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sxVBJs1okE
And a tweet, where we can chat about it (we can here too, obviously): https://twitter.com/fabgenovese/status/1351124519231086592
Here it comes the second installment of our work about Extended Petri Nets! Petri Nets with Mana: A Framework for Chemical Reaction Modelling Video presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sxVBJs1okE arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06234 Enjoy!
- Fabrizio Romano Genovese (@fabgenovese)Two more papers on this topic will follow in the next couple of weeks, so stay tuned! :smile:
It's a beautiful paper, guys
Two things I really liked:
:grinning:
Thanks @Matteo Capucci (he/him) !
Matteo Capucci (he/him) said:
Two things I really liked:
- Manas and a reference to Turing-completeness of Magic
- Laxity as a tool to probe global observables. This one a lot!
(the like emoji is a magic wand, fyi)
I'm actually really glad that this idea of "laxity gives you local info about global behavior" is understood. I was fearing we didn't stress it enough in the paper. It is the main conceptual contribution of this work imho.
That + a really funky Grothendieck construction which I'm glad I didn't have to come up with :laughing:
Lol :grinning: