You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I don't remember whether I asked this question here before! is the (cartesian) prop whose morphisms are smooth functions . I feel intuitively like there ought to be a monad on describing normal distributions, which is given on objects by , ie. to a space with enough dimensions to describe a mean vector and a covariance matrix. Has anyone worked this out, or does anyone know good reasons why it should or shouldn't work? The obvious barrier is that not every point in is a valid covariance matrix, but my gut feeling is that there should be some simple trick to avoid that.
That's an interesting question. A more severe problem is going to be the functoriality of : usually we'd expect the action of on morphisms to be given by taking the pushforward of measures, right? Now the problem is that a pushfoward of a Gaussian along a smooth map is typically not a Gaussian.
Intuitively I'd say that there probably isn't a probability monad for Gaussian measures for any reasonable choice of morphisms. But Gaussian kernels nevertheless form a Markov category.
Didn't think of that! Good point...
What maps can you push forward Gaussian distributions along? Just affine? But then the monad multiplication probably isn't an affine map...
Exactly! And even then it'll be pretty difficult to find a family of bijections such that conjugating with them will turn the pushfoward maps into affine maps.
Interesting. Thanks! That makes this an extra use-case for Markov categories, vs the monad centric way of thinking about categorical probability