Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: algebraic topology

Topic: trivial Kan fibrations


view this post on Zulip Leopold Schlicht (Dec 16 2021 at 17:36):

Look at this theorem. How can one deduce from that theorem that whenever hh and hh' are both composites of ff and gg, then hh is homotopic to hh'?

Recall that a simplicial set XX is called a contractible Kan complex if the unique map XΔ0X\to \Delta^0 is a trivial Kan fibration. In the above theorem I interpret "contractible Kan complex" as something like "essentially a singleton", so that intuitively, the theorem says that the space of all composition witnesses σ\sigma with d2σ=fd_2\sigma = f and d0σ=gd_0\sigma = g is essentially a singleton. (And intuitively, if such a σ\sigma is unique, then in particular the composition h=d1σh=d_1\sigma of ff and gg is unique, which motivates the first question.)

Does that make sense: is a trivial Kan fibration something like a bijection, isomorphism, or equivalence between simplicial sets? If not, what is a trivial Kan fibration intuitively?

Let GG be a directed graph and C\mathcal C an \infty-category. This theorem says that there exists a trivial Kan fibration Fun(N(Path[G]),C)Fun(G,C)\operatorname{Fun}( \operatorname{N}_{\bullet }( \operatorname{Path}[G] ), \mathcal{C}) \rightarrow \operatorname{Fun}( G_{\bullet }, \mathcal{C}). (Fun\operatorname{Fun} denotes exponential objects, Path[G]\operatorname{Path}[G] is the path category of the directed graph GG, and GG_\bullet is the 1\leq 1-dimensional simplicial set corresponding to GG.) Does that imply that there is a bijection between the functors (simplicial maps) from N(Path[G]) \operatorname{N}_{\bullet }( \operatorname{Path}[G]) to C\mathcal C and the simplicial maps from GG_\bullet to C\mathcal C? (A related fact I know is that an inner anodyne map is a bijection on vertices.)

view this post on Zulip Andrea Gentili (Dec 17 2021 at 17:58):

Leopold Schlicht said:

Look at this theorem. How can one deduce from that theorem that whenever hh and hh' are both composites of ff and gg, then hh is homotopic to hh'?

If you apply the definition of a trivial Kan fibration in the case n=1n=1 to this situation, you obtain a map Δ2×Δ1C\Delta^2\times\Delta^1\to\mathcal{C} constant on Λ21×Δ1\Lambda_2^1\times\Delta^1 (that is, a homotopy between the compositions, seen as 2-simplices); in particuar, you obtain the homotopy between the composites you're looking for as the restriction along d1×idΔ1 ⁣:Δ1×Δ1Δ2×Δ1d_1\times\mathrm{id}_{\Delta^1}\colon\Delta^1\times\Delta^1\hookrightarrow\Delta^2\times\Delta^1.

Does that imply that there is a bijection between the functors (simplicial maps) from N(Path[G]) \operatorname{N}_{\bullet }( \operatorname{Path}[G]) to C\mathcal C and the simplicial maps from GG_\bullet to C\mathcal C? (A related fact I know is that an inner anodyne map is a bijection on vertices.)

Not a bijection in general: consider the case G=Λ21G_\bullet =\Lambda_2^1, so that Path[G]=Δ2\mathrm{Path}[G]=\Delta^2 (as above, injectivity is up to homotopy).

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Dec 17 2021 at 19:13):

A trivial Kan fibration is a special sort of equivalence.

view this post on Zulip Leopold Schlicht (Dec 27 2021 at 16:59):

@Andrea Gentili Thanks!

If you apply the definition of a trivial Kan fibration in the case n=1n=1 to this situation, you obtain a map Δ2×Δ1C\Delta^2\times\Delta^1\to\mathcal{C} constant on Λ21×Δ1\Lambda_2^1\times\Delta^1 (that is, a homotopy between the compositions, seen as 2-simplices); in particuar, you obtain the homotopy between the composites you're looking for as the restriction along d1×idΔ1 ⁣:Δ1×Δ1Δ2×Δ1d_1\times\mathrm{id}_{\Delta^1}\colon\Delta^1\times\Delta^1\hookrightarrow\Delta^2\times\Delta^1.

What do you mean by "to this situation"? The only thing I can imagine is the following: let σ\sigma be a witness of h=gfh=g\circ f and σ\sigma' be a witness of h=gfh'=g\circ f. Since Fun(Δ2,C)×Fun(Λ12,C){(g,,f)}\operatorname{Fun}( \Delta ^2, \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}) \times _{ \operatorname{Fun}( \Lambda ^2_1, \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}) } \{ (g, \bullet , f) \} is a contractible Kan complex, every map Δ1Fun(Δ2,C)×Fun(Λ12,C){(g,,f)}\partial \Delta^1\to \operatorname{Fun}( \Delta ^2, \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}) \times _{ \operatorname{Fun}( \Lambda ^2_1, \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}) } \{ (g, \bullet , f) \} can be extended to a map Δ1Fun(Δ2,C)×Fun(Λ12,C){(g,,f)}\Delta^1\to \operatorname{Fun}( \Delta ^2, \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}) \times _{ \operatorname{Fun}( \Lambda ^2_1, \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}) } \{ (g, \bullet , f) \}. Now we could plug in (σ,σ)(\sigma, \sigma') as the map Δ1Fun(Δ2,C)×Fun(Λ12,C){(g,,f)}\partial \Delta^1\to \operatorname{Fun}( \Delta ^2, \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}) \times _{ \operatorname{Fun}( \Lambda ^2_1, \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}) } \{ (g, \bullet , f) \}. But I don't see how a map of the type Δ2×Δ1C\Delta^2\times\Delta^1\to\mathcal{C} appears.

@Mike Shulman Thanks. Can you make that more precise?

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Dec 27 2021 at 17:07):

Any trivial Kan fibration is a simplicial homotopy equivalence. See for instance Corollary 1.4.5.5 here.

view this post on Zulip Leopold Schlicht (Dec 27 2021 at 17:10):

I didn't know that that's what is called a "simplicial homotopy equivalence". Thanks. I interpret this corollary as saying that a trivial Kan fibration is (surjective) and (injective up to homotopy) (as Andrea already said).

view this post on Zulip Andrea Gentili (Dec 27 2021 at 18:55):

You understood correctly. Once you have the map Δ1Fun(Δ2,C)×Fun(Λ21,C){(g,,f)}\Delta^1\to\mathrm{Fun}(\Delta^2 ,\mathcal C)\times_{\mathrm{Fun}(\Lambda_2^1 ,\mathcal C)}\{ (g,\bullet ,f)\}, you have to keep in mind that Fun(Δ2,C)×Fun(Λ21,C){(g,,f)}\mathrm{Fun}(\Delta^2 ,\mathcal C)\times_{\mathrm{Fun}(\Lambda_2^1 ,\mathcal C)}\{ (g,\bullet ,f)\} can be seen as a subspace of Fun(Δ2,C)\mathrm{Fun}(\Delta^2 ,\mathcal C), so that you have a map Δ1Fun(Δ2,C)\Delta^1\to\mathrm{Fun}(\Delta^2 ,\mathcal C), that, by adjunction, gives you the map Δ2×Δ1C\Delta^2\times\Delta^1\to\mathcal C.

view this post on Zulip Leopold Schlicht (Dec 27 2021 at 19:34):

Thanks! I now see how to get the map Δ1×Δ1Δ2×Δ1C\Delta^1\times\Delta^1\hookrightarrow\Delta^2\times\Delta^1\to\mathcal C. Are you then using Corollary 1.3.3.7 to obtain a homotopy hhh\to h' from that map Δ1×Δ1C\Delta^1\times\Delta^1\to\mathcal C?

view this post on Zulip Leopold Schlicht (Dec 27 2021 at 19:45):

Mike Shulman said:

Any trivial Kan fibration is a simplicial homotopy equivalence. See for instance Corollary 1.4.5.5 here.

Ah, here is that statement. Also, if both the domain and the codomain of a trivial Kan fibration are \infty-categories, then the trivial Kan fibration is an equivalence of \infty-categories.

view this post on Zulip Andrea Gentili (Dec 27 2021 at 19:55):

Are you then using Corollary 1.3.3.7 to obtain a homotopy hhh\to h' from that map Δ1×Δ1C\Delta^1\times\Delta^1\to\mathcal C?

Yes (the conditions of the corollary are satisfied since the original map factorizes through Fun(Δ2,C)×Fun(Λ21,C){(g,,f)}\mathrm{Fun}(\Delta^2,\mathcal C)\times_{\mathrm{Fun}(\Lambda_2^1,\mathcal C)}\{ (g,\bullet ,f)\}).

view this post on Zulip Leopold Schlicht (Dec 28 2021 at 10:39):

Thanks!