You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Earlier this year I asked a question about the following functor:
where , and where is the unique nondegenerate simplex of such that there exists a surjection with (this comes from the 'Eilenberg-Zilber lemma').
We recently used this functor (but from augmented simplicial sets to simplicial sets) in a submitted paper, and a reviewer informed that actually
"is in fact a composition of two functors: a realization functor from simplicial sets to preordered sets, followed by the forgetful functor from preorders to sets. The realization functor is left adjoint to the nerve functor, thus it means that you implicitly work with some comonad structure. Perhaps it's worth checking."
This is because we postcomposed with the (augmented) simplicial nerve functor from prosets (preordered sets) to augmented simplicial sets.
I have two questions about this:
How can I verify that ? I think the formula for is but I'm not sure how to compute it in practice. I think another name for is the 'fundamental category' functor.
It seems reasonable, since the realization is gluing simplices together and the degenerate ones with the same generator should get identified in the colimit (?)
More vaguely... what could this comonad structure possibly do for me? Are there some examples of interesting uses of this particular comonad ?
By the way, my paper is on arxiv and this composition appears on page 5 (there ). The topic of the paper is distributed computing.
Thank You
naso said:
- How can I verify that ? I think the formula for is but I'm not sure how to compute it in practice. I think another name for is the 'fundamental category' functor.
It seems reasonable, since the realization is gluing simplices together and the degenerate ones with the same generator should get identified in the colimit (?)
If you mean given by that colimit formula, I don't think this is correct. For example , and has points, while should have .
I think you can get as the composition of the restriction functor from simplicial sets to presheaves on the wide subcategory of consisting of surjective maps, followed by the colimit functor. Not sure if there really is a comonad hiding in all this.