You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Is there any literature about presheaves on , i.e. the category of finite ordinals with the first infinite ordinal adjoined and all order-preserving maps? And is there a name for these?
@Nasos Evangelou-Oost Note that these are equivalent to -sets, where is the monoid of all order-preserving endofunctions of the ordinal .
I'm not aware of any literature on these, but @Yuki Maehara gave a talk on a topic very close to this at the Australian Category Seminar on 29 July 2020, under the title "Augmented simplicial sets as -sets".
The of his title is a certain submonoid (of "eventually consecutive" order-preserving endofunctions) of the monoid I described above. The main theorem of the talk was that the category of augmented simplicial sets is comonadic over the category of -sets.
Are there slides? Sounds like a potential topological monoid opportunity.
Morgan Rogers (he/him) said:
Are there slides? Sounds like a potential topological monoid opportunity.
No slides, it was a "board" talk.
In that case, is @Yuki Maehara here occasionally? I want to know more about the adjunction between M-sets and augmented simplicial sets. Specifically, does the left adjoint have any stronger properties?
I just put my notes on my website: https://yukimaehara.github.io/notes/Msets.pdf
The construction of the left adjoint is quite simple, so if you have any specific property in mind, it shouldn't be too hard to check whether it has that property!
Alexander Campbell said:
Nasos Evangelou-Oost Note that these are equivalent to -sets, where is the monoid of all order-preserving endofunctions of the ordinal .
Could you say briefly how this equivalence works please? Is it by extending the adjunction described in Yuki's notes? I.e. just by 'padding' and 'unpadding'?
(Seeing this for the first time; I have a large backlog of unread posts.)
It's that your simplex category with adjoined is the idempotent-splitting completion of as a one-object category. In general, the category of presheaves is equivalent to the category of presheaves on the idempotent-splitting completion (note there is essentially only one way to extend from to ).