You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
In simplicial sets there is an 'interchange' map
given by
where is the cartesian product and is the join.
Is it a monomorphism? How can I see that it is or is not? I know the criterion of monomorphism (left-cancellative) but I don't know how to check if it holds here.
Nasos Evangelou-Oost said:
In simplicial sets there is an 'interchange' map
given by
where is the cartesian product and is the join.
Is it a monomorphism? How can I see that it is or is not? I know the criterion of monomorphism (left-cancellative) but I don't know how to check if it holds here.
Ok, now I'm thinking it is a mono but I'm not completely confident in my reasoning: If and then since ,
for some with .
Now .
So if then since the dimensions and components must match, so is a monomorphism?
I also asked this on StackExchange (no answer yet) https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4393365/interchange-map-in-simplicial-sets-is-a-monomorphism
Simplicial sets form a presheaf category. In particular, for a map to be a mono, you only need to check that it's componentwise injective.
Morgan Rogers (he/him) said:
Simplicial sets form a presheaf category. In particular, for a map to be a mono, you only need to check that it's componentwise injective.
thanks @Morgan Rogers (he/him) , I do know that, this is what I was trying to check. Sorry if it was not clear
Let's work through it! Explicitly,
is
where I'm taking the shortcut of taking the join of augmenting and then truncating the simplicial sets to simplify the notation. Meanwhile,
If I'm not mistaken, the map sends to , with no identification happening. This is "obviously" injective, since if two simplices in the domain have equal images, their component simplices must be the same.
Very clear! Thank you, Morgan :smile: :pray:
I'll copy that across to stackexchange and correct the indices.