You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Let be a monoid, its simplicial nerve and its heyting algebra of subobjects.
For we can define an -indexed set where is the set of shuffles of and .
We can then define where is the smallest simplicial subset such that in (well-defined since is a complete lattice).
On the other hand, the maximal nondegenerate dimensional -cells of the cartesian product can be identified with the set of shuffles
Vague question: can be described constructively in terms of rather than by the closure operation ?
Is it the image of the composite of the left-hand maps in below? (Where are the inclusion maps,
is the quotient map from the free product of with itself to the cartesian product, and is the projection.) image.png
Nasos Evangelou-Oost said:
Let be a monoid, its simplicial nerve and its heyting algebra of subobjects.
Subobjects in the category of simplicial sets, presumably?
For we can define an -indexed set where is the set of shuffles of and .
What's a shuffle?
We can then define where is the smallest simplicial subset such that in (well-defined since is a complete lattice).
If I understand this correctly, you're saying is a subset of for each , and you're asking for the simplicial subset of generated by the elements of these subsets?
Morgan Rogers (he/him) said:
"Subobjects in the category of simplicial sets, presumably?"
Yes
"What's a shuffle?"
I mean a shuffle product kind of as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuffle_algebra#Shuffle_product , but with a union of words rather than a formal sum. Sorry I'm not sure how to define it concisely, but do you see what I mean?
"If I understand this correctly, you're saying is a subset of for each , and you're asking for the simplicial subset of generated by the elements of these subsets?"
Yes