Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: algebraic topology

Topic: Delta generated spaces


view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Aug 08 2022 at 17:30):

While discussing with a friend we realized that the Delta generated spaces are actually generated by paths.
I find this very surprising.
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Delta-generated+topological+space
I was going to add the proof to this page but because of the current state of the nlab I don't think it's editable so i'm posting it here

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Aug 08 2022 at 17:32):

Let Π\Pi be the functor TopTop\mathbf{Top}\to\mathbf{Top} which associates to each space XX the finest topology such that every path in XX lifts to a path in Π(X)\Pi(X).

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Aug 08 2022 at 17:33):

Prop - Suppose XX is first countable and locally path-connected. Then Π(X)\Pi(X) is homeomorphic to XX.

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Aug 08 2022 at 17:33):

Proof:

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Aug 08 2022 at 18:03):

Let xx be a point in XX. We know already that the map Π(X)X\Pi(X)\to X is continuous. Let WW be a neighborhood of xx in the Π(X)\Pi(X) topology; we will show that WW is a neighborhood of xx in the original topology.

Without loss of generality we can choose a small path connected open neighborhood of xx and restrict to considering this subspace. Therefore wlog suppose XX is path connected.

First-countable spaces are, in particular, sequential, so it suffices to show that every sequence {xn}\{ x_n \} approaching xx in the original topology is eventually in WW. Introduce such a sequence. Let {Uk} \{U_k\} be a countable neighborhood basis of xx; without loss of generality suppose the sequence is descending. Let {Vk}\{V_k\} be a sequence of path-connected open neighborhoods of xx with VkUkV_k\subset U_k.

Without loss of generality assume that all the xnx_n live in V0V_0, discarding from the sequence the finitely many that do not.

Define a function T:NNT : \mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}, where we let T(k)T(k) be the greatest natural number such that xiVT(k)x_i \in V_{T(k)} for all iki \geq k (or kk if there is no upper bound.) T(k)T(k) is monotonically increasing and grows to infinity.

For each natural number kk choose a path σk\sigma_k from xkx_k to xk+1x_{k+1} in VT(k)V_{T(k)}. Assemble these sequences into a single path σ:IX\sigma: I\to X which is defined by σk\sigma_k on the interval [12k,12(k+1)][1 - 2^{-k}, 1- 2^{-(k+1)}], and define σ(1)=x\sigma(1) = x. It is obvious that σ\sigma is continuous at all points less than 11. To prove it is continuous at 11, it suffices to prove that each σ1(Un)\sigma^{-1}(U_n) is a neighborhood of 11. This holds because eventually all the segments that compose the path σ\sigma lie in VkV_k for some k>nk> n, and VkUnV_k \subset U_n for $k > n$$.

Thus σ\sigma is continuous. Since WW is a neighborhood in the Π(X)\Pi(X) topology, there exists some ϵ\epsilon such that σ((1ϵ,1])W\sigma( (1-\epsilon, 1])\subset W. But by the construction of σ\sigma this means that all but finitely many points xnx_n are in WW, and since XX is sequential, WW is a neighborhood of xx in XX. This concludes the proof.

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Aug 08 2022 at 18:07):

Applying this proposition, simplices are obviously first countable and locally path connected, thus Π(Δn)Δn\Pi(\Delta^n)\cong \Delta^n for all nn.

It follows that if f:ΔnXf : \Delta^n\to X is continuous, then Π(f):Π(Δn)Π(X)\Pi(f) : \Pi(\Delta^n) \to \Pi(X) can be composed with this homeomorphism to give a continuous map ΔnΠ(Δn)Π(X)\Delta^n\cong \Pi(\Delta^n)\to \Pi(X). So every singular nn-simplex factors through the Π\Pi-topology, i.e. Π\Pi is right adjoint to the forgetful functor from Δ\Delta generated spaces to all spaces.

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Aug 08 2022 at 18:08):

It runs badly counter to my intuition. Somehow one-dimensional paths should not be able to access or reconstruct higher dimensional data... but I think the proof is correct, anyway.

view this post on Zulip David Michael Roberts (Aug 09 2022 at 10:03):

The nLab is editable! That got sorted a little while back, the migration to the new software that was holding up being able to edit was canned. Please also pop in an edit summary if and when you do put in in there, and check the nForum for subsequent discussion

view this post on Zulip David Michael Roberts (Aug 09 2022 at 10:13):

Isn't the space Π(X)\Pi(X) the same underlying set as XX plus the final topology coming from all continuous functions IXI\to X? That is, we can write Π(X)\Pi(X) as a quotient XIIΠ(X)\coprod_{X^I} I \twoheadrightarrow \Pi(X). I'm wondering if there is anything that could be done with this quotient map, together with the one exhibiting XX itself as a quotient of a coproduct of topological simplices (of all dimensions), which give a commuting square. Maybe that's too formal.

view this post on Zulip David Michael Roberts (Aug 09 2022 at 10:16):

I like your idea, though. It's reminiscent of [[Boman's theorem]], which is very close to being (if not the same as) the analogous statement in the category of smooth manifolds, using R\mathbb{R} instead of [0,1][0,1].

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Aug 09 2022 at 11:21):

David Michael Roberts said:

Isn't the space Π(X)\Pi(X) the same underlying set as XX plus the final topology coming from all continuous functions IXI\to X? That is, we can write Π(X)\Pi(X) as a quotient XIIΠ(X)\coprod_{X^I} I \twoheadrightarrow \Pi(X). I'm wondering if there is anything that could be done with this quotient map, together with the one exhibiting XX itself as a quotient of a coproduct of topological simplices (of all dimensions), which give a commuting square. Maybe that's too formal.

Yes, that's the space I'm talking about.

view this post on Zulip Zhen Lin Low (Aug 09 2022 at 11:59):

Hmmm. For comparison, is it surprising that the category of sequential spaces is generated by the "free convergent sequence"? I think this is a similar phenomenon. Your argument seems to show that, for a first-countable locally path connected space, knowing about the paths also tells you about the convergent sequences, so such spaces are also "path-generated". Since the standard simplices are first-countable locally path connected, this implies Δ-spaces are "path-generated".

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Aug 09 2022 at 12:33):

I see, that's a good observation

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Aug 09 2022 at 12:35):

There are surjective continuous maps Δ1Δn\Delta^1 \to \Delta^n for any nn (space-filling curves), which give an "explicit" description of Δn\Delta^n as a quotient of Δ1\Delta^1.

view this post on Zulip Zhen Lin Low (Aug 09 2022 at 12:42):

I was wondering about that whether the existence of space filling curves has anything to do with it, but I don't see how...

view this post on Zulip Tim Campion (Aug 15 2022 at 17:47):

Clark Barwick always refers to Δ\Delta-generated spaces as "numerically-generated spaces", precisely because they are generated by R\mathbb{R}.