Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: deprecated: logic

Topic: Filters


view this post on Zulip সায়ন্তন রায় (Jun 21 2020 at 13:34):

I was recently going through the notion of filters on a set. The definition of an ultrafilter in the book says that an ultrafilter is a maximal proper filter. Then it is claimed that if FF is a proper filter then FF is equal to the intersection of all the ultrafilters that contain FF. How do I show that the intersection of all the ultrafilters that contain FF is contained in FF?

view this post on Zulip Lê Thành Dũng (Tito) Nguyễn (Jun 21 2020 at 14:01):

Suppose that FF is a proper filter on P(X)\mathcal{P}(X) and let SXS \subset X be a non-empty set that is not in FF. Consider F={SSF:(SS)S}F ' = \{S'' \mid \exists S' \in F : (S' \setminus S) \subset S''\}. This FF' is a proper filter, containing the complement of SS, and it can be extended to some ultrafilter (by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_prime_ideal_theorem#The_ultrafilter_lemma ). So there is an ultrafilter that contains FF and not SS.