You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I was recently going through the notion of filters on a set. The definition of an ultrafilter in the book says that an ultrafilter is a maximal proper filter. Then it is claimed that if is a proper filter then is equal to the intersection of all the ultrafilters that contain . How do I show that the intersection of all the ultrafilters that contain is contained in ?
Suppose that is a proper filter on and let be a non-empty set that is not in . Consider . This is a proper filter, containing the complement of , and it can be extended to some ultrafilter (by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_prime_ideal_theorem#The_ultrafilter_lemma ). So there is an ultrafilter that contains and not .