Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: reading & references

Topic: internal categories in a presheaf category


view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Aug 06 2025 at 15:30):

I am looking for a standard reference for the fact that there is an isomorphism of 2-categories Cat([C,Set])[C,Cat]\text{Cat}([C, \text{Set}]) \cong [C, \text{Cat}] (by "standard", I mean either the earliest reference, or a textbook reference). I looked in Johnstone's books, where this fact is surely mentioned, but I couldn't spot it. Does anyone have any suggestions?

view this post on Zulip Fernando Yamauti (Aug 06 2025 at 15:36):

I think there's a typo. Do you really want internal cats in a 2-topos?

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Aug 06 2025 at 15:44):

Thanks, I fixed the typo.

view this post on Zulip Bryce Clarke (Aug 06 2025 at 16:50):

Nathanael Arkor said:

I am looking for a standard reference for the fact that there is an isomorphism of 2-categories Cat([C,Set])[C,Cat]\text{Cat}([C, \text{Set}]) \cong [C, \text{Cat}] (by "standard", I mean either the earliest reference, or a textbook reference). I looked in Johnstone's books, where this fact is surely mentioned, but I couldn't spot it. Does anyone have any suggestions?

I think it is in his Topos Theory book, but as an exercise.

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Aug 06 2025 at 16:54):

Ah, that may be why I hadn't spotted it in the book.

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Aug 06 2025 at 16:56):

image.png
This seems the closest, but it's still not quite what I'm looking for.

view this post on Zulip fosco (Aug 06 2025 at 17:19):

Considering the topic of his thesis, @Enrico Ghiorzi might know if there is a precise reference for this result. I think somewhere, someday, I have seen the statement that for every essentially algebraic theory T, T-models in [C,Set] are functors C -> Mod(T) (is that even true?)

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Aug 06 2025 at 17:33):

It is true, and I know of a reference for that more general result, but I imagine there should be a reference specific to internal categories much earlier.

view this post on Zulip Bryce Clarke (Aug 07 2025 at 05:39):

Screenshot 2025-08-07 at 7.34.41 am.png
Page 342 in the Elephant has this paragraph (which is still not a reference).

view this post on Zulip Bryce Clarke (Aug 07 2025 at 05:48):

Nathanael Arkor said:

image.png
This seems the closest, but it's still not quite what I'm looking for.

I think the closest is reading Exercise 5 and Exercise 6 in Topos Theory together, which characterises the image of G as the split opfibrations.

view this post on Zulip Bryce Clarke (Aug 07 2025 at 05:52):

Screenshot 2025-08-07 at 7.50.33 am.png
Of course! Adrian Miranda's Masters thesis is where to look!
https://doi.org/10.25949/19434626.v1

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Aug 07 2025 at 06:57):

Thanks for investigating! I suppose that, given that Adrian didn't give a reference for the result, he hadn't found a good reference either.