You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Related to the other thread about special properties of presheaf toposes, I'm wondering about the -toposes you get by taking an -groupoid and looking at the over-category (equivalently ). This is slightly more specific than 'presheaf -topos', since I'm only interested in being an -groupoid rather than an -category. Again I'm mostly intereted in the properties these have from an internal logic point of view.
Interesting question! I'll just reiterate my point from the other question, again not internal, that ooGrpd/X will always be lfp while general grothendieck topoi are not
If we break up X into its connected components we get that ooGrpd^X is a product of topoi of G-equivariant oo groupoids for G an infinity group (eg topological group)
A fancy way to say nothing is that a grothendieck oo topos E is of the form you're looking at iff the terminal geometric morphism E -> ooGrpd is étale
This is even easier: they're always Boolean and satisfy the axiom of choice!
Mike Shulman said:
This is even easier: they're always Boolean and satisfy the axiom of choice!
Really? That's interesting, because the 1-dimensional analogue doesn't satisfy choice. What leads to the difference?
Brendan Murphy said:
A fancy way to say nothing is that a grothendieck oo topos E is of the form you're looking at iff the terminal geometric morphism E -> ooGrpd is étale
Oh, this is slightly less useless than I thought. Rezk uses an intrinsic characterization of being étale to give an answer to this question https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2018/10/topoi_of_gsets.html#c054844
@Brendan Murphy Thanks! That's the kind of thing I was looking for.
I'm interested in Graham's question too. Could it be that they satisfy internal choice but not external choice?
Yes, I mean internal choice, since you said you were interested in properties of the internal logic. (Although if by "1-dimensional version" you mean a 1-topos when is a set, I think those do also satisfy "external choice" -- isn't it only when starts to be a groupoid that external choice fails?)
You might find something of interest in Lurie's answer to my MO question. There was some nForum discussion here.
Slicing always preserves internal properties.
@David Corfield One interesting thing about CABAs is that they can also be characterised as the complete boolean algebras in which limits and colimits distribute over each other. I find this algebraic definition nicer than demanding atomicity. I wonder if something similar works in the -topos case.
@Reid Barton Is it possible that these are precisely the -toposes with the same internal properties as ?
I doubt it, but I don't really know.