Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: reading & references

Topic: Ref Req: free resolutions in doctrines


view this post on Zulip James Deikun (Apr 11 2025 at 14:34):

I somehow have the impression that it's classical that the bar resolutions of Assoc\mathsf{Assoc} and Comm\mathsf{Comm} wrt the monadic adjunction between collections and operads give good simplicial presentations of AA_\infty and EE_\infty respectively but I don't know where (or who) this is from.

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (Apr 11 2025 at 14:43):

Also can you get some kind of presentation of spectra from the bar resolution of the Lawvere theory of Abelian groups in the doctrine of Lawvere theories?

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (Apr 11 2025 at 22:42):

It seems like the [[Koszul-Tate resolution]] is commonly used across the [[Dold-Kan correspondence]] to take these resolutions of operads and I can find lots of references on that ... OTOH the simplicial [[Boardman-Vogt resolution]] is comparatively really complicated and only works for some operads (you have to use a separate technique to get started with EE_\infty) so I'm starting to wonder if this is even true.

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (Apr 12 2025 at 03:22):

Well, it's at least certainly true when you resolve Assoc\mathsf{Assoc} as a planar operad. The bar resolution of a planar operad PP has as nn-simplices, planar trees with their vertices labelled by operations of PP and their internal edges labelled 00 to nn. The simplicial maps pick a kk from that range, contract all edges labelled strictly greater than kk via composition, and then relabel the remaining edges using a function that fixes 00. The augmentation maps evaluate the whole tree, and the "extra degeneracies" increase all the edge numbers by 1. This actually seems to be the same as planar simplicial Boardman-Vogt on a discrete PP, and certainly produces the same barycentric triangulation of the Stasheff associahedra.

As for the non-planar case, I'm not exactly sure what a good simplicial EE_\infty looks like for comparison.

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (Apr 12 2025 at 03:38):

(An alternate description of the above trees: A nn-simplex is a sequence of n+1n+1 formal expressions in PP each of which is a partial evaluation of the last, face maps drop one expression, degeneracies duplicate one, the augmentation is total evaluation, and the extra degeneracies tack on the total evaluation to the end of the sequence.)

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (Apr 12 2025 at 11:05):

I think the bar resolution for a Lawvere theory TT looks like this: kk-ary points are lists of definitions yi=fi(x1,...,xk,y0,...,yi1)y_i = f_i(x_1,...,x_k,y_0,...,y_{i-1}) where fif_i is an element of the free TT-model on the listed variables as generators. kk-ary nn-simplices are sequences of n+1n+1 kk-ary points where each one comes from the previous one by substituting away some of the yy's and then renumbering so they're consecutive again. The face maps again throw away elements of the sequence, degeneracies again duplicate them, the augmentation substitutes away everything except the last definition, and the extra degeneracies again add the content of the augmentation to the end of the list.

I can't really think of a way a simplicial Bar(Ab)\mathrm{Bar}(\mathsf{Ab})-algebra can be seen as a spectrum object, so EE_\infty is still very much up in the air as far as I'm concerned. And I'm still looking for a reference for the known-good AA_\infty case.

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (Apr 12 2025 at 15:11):

It looks like the simplicial [[Barratt-Eccles operad]] comes out of a bar resolution for the monadic adjunction between symmetric operads and planar collections, which makes me interested in taking a second look at Ab\mathsf{Ab}.

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Apr 12 2025 at 15:22):

I don't think you get the EE_\infty operad as the bar resolution for the operad Comm\text{Comm}; I think you get something I may have seen called CC_\infty.

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (Apr 12 2025 at 17:49):

From studying https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9403055 it seems like CC_\infty is the bar resolution for Comm\mathsf{Comm} with respect to the monadic adjunction between symmetric operads and symmetric collections while EE_\infty appears when you take the bar resolution with respect to the monadic adjunction between symmetric operads and planar collections. In the former case the actions of the symmetric groups are "invisible" to the bar construction and don't get homotopically weakened whereas in the latter case they are visible and do get weakened.