Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: reading & references

Topic: Descent for Cones in (Triangulated) dg-Categories?


view this post on Zulip Chris Grossack (she/they) (Mar 25 2026 at 20:31):

Hey all, I'm crossposting this question from MathOverflow since it seems likely that someone in the zulip might also know where to look!

view this post on Zulip Chris Grossack (she/they) (Mar 25 2026 at 20:32):

If I have a triangulated dg-category C\mathcal{C} (or stable \infty-category, if you prefer) defined over a finite field k=Fqk = \mathbb{F}_q, I can base change that category to one defined over k\overline{k} by tensoring all the homsets with k\overline{k}. I'm curious how this operation works with cones. Since for a degree 11 map f:(A,dA)(B,dB)f : (A,d_A) \to (B,d_B) we compute Cone(f)\text{Cone}(f) as (AB,(dA0fdB))\left (A \oplus B, \begin{pmatrix} d_A & 0 \\ f & d_B \end{pmatrix} \right ), which makes equal sense over kk or over k\overline{k}, it seems believable that cones should commute with base change. A higher brow approach might be to say that cones are kind of (homotopy) colimit, which thus gets preserved by the left adjoint k-\otimes \overline{k}.

My question, then, is if there's literature on descent in this context. In particular, an indecomposable object XX of Ck\mathcal{C}_k might break up into a sum of smaller indecomposables λXλ\bigoplus_\lambda X_\lambda in Ck\mathcal{C}_{\overline{k}} after base change. I'm interested in computing the cone of a map fk:XYf_k : X \to Y in Ck\mathcal{C}_k by moving to fk:λXλμYμf_{\overline{k}} : \bigoplus_\lambda X_\lambda \to \bigoplus_\mu Y_\mu in Ck\mathcal{C}_{\overline{k}}. Ideally one could then recognize Cone(fk)\text{Cone}(f_{\overline{k}}) as being "something  k\otimes \ \overline{k}" by some descent theorem, and even more ideally this "something" would be Cone(fk)\text{Cone}(f_k).

Thanks in advance for any references on these ideas!