You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Is anybody familiar with differential cohomology (in the sense of Urs Schreiber's work on it)? It seems like all the things I can read about it deal only with the smooth case, and say that things should sort of work the same in the holomorphic case, but I don't think this is very obvious at all...
yes, i’m interested in deligne cohomology, which is why i’m trying to understand differential cohomology!
to be a bit more specific, here’s an example of something i’d like to know: the theory of -connections is studied in a lot of detail in the context of differential cohomology, but holomorphic connections don’t usually exist (globally), and we have no partitions of unity, and generally the complex world is much less well behaved than the smooth one
so does this introduce problems when actually trying to apply this theory to the holomorphic case? or are there sneaky ways around it?
see also https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/8324/holomorphic-cohomology/?Focus=68404#Comment_68404
Yes, do get in touch with Finnur, he is a very nice guy.
Also, if you are interested in specific examples, then I believe the basic gerbe on a complex reductive Lie group can be equipped with at least a connection, if not a curving (working from memory here), hence something corresponding to a cocycle in holomorphic Deligne cohomology. There's a preprint by Brylinski (basically the last before he left academia) and a more recent paper (in the last 6 years or so) on this. I was once trying to write down, with Raymond Vozzo, an explicit model for, and connection and curving on, the gerbe on , but we ended up doing something else.
will get in touch with Finnur, thanks for the suggestions :)
@David Michael Roberts do you remember the titles of these two papers?
Here's the Brylinski one: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0002158
I'll have to hunt around and dig up the other one, my searching of obvious things isn't turning it up very quickly.
Ah, here it is: http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/32/30/32-30abs.html
I hope these are helpful, @Tim Hosgood !
@Rongmin Lu I don't recall the question, perhaps you can remind me (it was a long time ago!)
@Tim Hosgood check this one out as well, it's also by Brylinski, published in the 90s: http://www.numdam.org/item/?id=AST_1994__226__145_0
wonderful, thank you!