You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
In a formalization context I encountered the following variation on the notion of a concrete sheaf.
Let be a concrete site (or something similar, I'm not too concerned with exact conditions yet) and write for the codiscrete sheaf functor (so for where is the "underlying set" of ). I'd like to consider the category whose
objects are pairs where and is a subsheaf of
(equivalently, a pair of and a monomorphism );
morphisms from to are maps such that the induced map carries into
(equivalently, a map together with a commutative square ... whose top map is uniquely determined, when it exists, by the bottom map ).
Compared to the usual category of concrete sheaves, the difference is supposed to be that we don't require the map to be an isomorphism, only a monomorphism. So we can also describe an objects as a concrete sheaf plus a possibly bigger set containing .
Does anyone know a name for this category?
I think it can probably also be described as the category of concrete sheaves on a site obtained by adjoining a new terminal object to . At least it seems to work for the case , in which case the category I describe is the category of monomorphisms in the category of sets.
A more down-to-earth way to describe the category is as the category whose objects are sets equipped with certain functions which are "good", satisfying a few axioms, and whose morphisms are functions that preserve the "good" maps. Notably we do not require every map out of to be good, though.
In the paper "Quasitoposes, Quasiadhesive Categories and Artin Glueing" by Johnstone, Lack and Sobociński I found the notation for the full subcategory of the comma category on the monomorphisms, and they show it is a quasitopos when is a functor between quasitopoi that preserves pullbacks (Theorem 16).
I also found this specific construction in https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0612727 under the name "quasispaces".