You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Hi all! This is the thread of discussion for Prakash' talk, "Projected limits of Markov processes".
When: Thursday September 3, 12 noon EDT (Boston time).
(Note that the time of the talk is back to usual.)
Zoom meeting:
https://mit.zoom.us/j/280120646
Meeting ID: 280 120 646
Youtube live stream:
https://youtu.be/editZPH4lZk
Note also that this is the third talk in a series, albeit it should be self-contained.
Hello! 20 minutes to start!
Here's the video!
https://youtu.be/ApDkCro7-v8
Hi @Prakash Panangaden! Unfortunately I've had to leave early yesterday, so let me ask my question here.
I wonder to what extent your result can be generalized to arbitrary diagram shapes, such as the case of continuous time. In other words, since a Markov process is a functor from , the category with a single object and endomorphism monoid , to Stoch, the Kleisli category of the Giry monad. A labelled Markov process is likewise a functor , where is the free monoid generated by the set of labels . So does your theory of bisimulation and approximation generalize to considering categories of functors , where is an arbitrary small category, and one can define bisimulation and prove approximations for these in the same way?
I'm asking this because it could potentially be of interest in the theory of discrete groups, where approximation properties of a measure-theoretical flavour (such as amenability) are of interest, and perhaps there's some relation to your approximation results?
Hi Tobias,
I hope this reply reaches you. I am very interested in the continuous-time case but there are all kinds of new phenomena in that case and I am not sure if a generic argument would capture all that. I can’t really answer your question without thinking hard about it but I would think that bisimulation should generalize to the case you want.
Perhaps we can discuss this over the coming months.
Best wishes,
Prakash
Thanks, @Prakash Panangaden! That makes sense to me. I understand that the case of continuous time comes with many other subtleties that a generic treatment would not see, so I had mentioned it only to give an obvious example. I think that the case of discrete group actions could be more interesting.