You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Hello all,
Here's the thread for Conal Elliott's talk, "Efficient automatic differentiation made easy via category theory".
When: Thursday October 29th, 12 noon EDT (Boston time)
Zoom meeting:
https://mit.zoom.us/j/280120646
Meeting ID: 280 120 646
Youtube live stream:
https://youtu.be/2StYHN-wX64
Hello all! We start in 5 minutes.
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.00746
Paper with abstract and related work: http://conal.net/papers/essence-of-ad/
Video here: https://youtu.be/17gfCTnw6uE
I was a bit confused by Conal's remarks on dual numbers (around the 73 minute mark). For instance, that they only work for scalars or 1-dimensional differentiation. (There were a few more remarks but let me start here.) On the contrary, if is a field and is any augmented commutative -algebra (i.e., comes equipped with a -algebra map , which you can think of as a point in ), then the evident augmented algebra represents derivations on , in the sense that augmented algebra maps are in natural bijection with linear maps such that , i.e., with tangent vectors at the "point" . Here the underlying -algebra of could be for example the algebra of smooth functions on a manifold of any dimension. So I'm not clear on the remark about 1-dimensionality. Better yet, you can think of as representing the tangent bundle functor.