You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
a simple question which my poor brain cannot unravel at the moment: what is the sleek categorical definition of the following category?
Given a topological space , let be the category whose objects are open subsets of , and whose morphisms are the continuous maps such that (where denotes the projection ) (and also such that is somehow locally holomorphic, but I don't really care about that bit).
It seems like some sort of slice construction, but where you take a product with , but I can never remember what such constructions are called.
This topic was moved here from #general > something like a slice category? by Nathanael Arkor
@_Notification Bot|100006 said:
This topic was moved here from #general > something like a slice category? by Nathanael Arkor
(woops, thank you!)
So and are spaces over , meaning they'r equipped with maps to , though of a very particular sort. Your equation is then saying precisely that your map is a map of spaces over .
So, you are describing a certain subcategory of the category of spaces over .
The category of spaces over is also called the slice category of , or (more descriptively yet tersely) the over category of . If you look at the link you'll see a commutative triangle, and this is precisely the equation you wrote down.
All the business about the space actually being an open subset of is too detailed and specialized to expect category theorists to have a name for it. :upside_down:
More precisely: there might be a name for the particular subcategory of the slice category that you care about, but I've never heard of it.
:+1:
what about this business of taking a product (ignoring the open set stuff)? as in, this specific type of slice category where you fix some X and then look at the category of “things producted with X as objects living over X”. does this have a snappy name?
Not that I know of. To me it's just some subcategory of the slice category. But maybe someone has made up a name for it.
Well, I guess I'd call something like a "trivial bundle" in some very general sense of the word "bundle".
So I guess I might call all the full subcategory of the slice category of consisting of objects of the form the "category of trivial bundles over ", if I had to call it something.
it does look rather bundle-y indeed
Yeah, a general locally trivial bundle is a bundle that's locally isomorphic to one of this "trivial" form.
But then you're going a further step and looking at subobjects of these "trivial bundles"... but not all subobjects, just "open" ones...
i guess i should just look up “mixed varieties” or “mixed complex spaces” up on the nlab and see if anybody has said anything there
but my go-to is now this zulip, since you get a nice chit chat with your answers :wink:
Just be done with it and call them Hosgood spaces.
"the zulip subcategory"
I assume this is intended to get at a definition of something like a family of complex manifolds over ? Is this what a "mixed complex space" is?
I thought about something like this in another context recently but I didn't know if there was a name for it.
yes, this is the definition that comes just before the definition of a mixed space (cf http://www.numdam.org/item/SHC_1960-1961__13_1_A1_0/)
aha, I didn't translate my search queries into french...
I'll have to read this more closely later but this looks interesting, thanks!
(it’s next on my list of things to translate, which is why i’m trying to understand it a bit better)