You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Hi,
I don't know much about model categories, but as I've been working from Hovey's book, I'd like to ask a question. As in the attached file, Screenshot-from-2023-03-28-12-00-14.png we have the homotopy category of a model category has all small products.
From this, I can talk about countable products in particular. Well, can we say the following?
If the maps are left homotopic for each , and and , then are left homotopic. It seems right to me, but I'm not sure about the details or extra assumptions, if needed. Any explanation or correction would be great.
This is true if is cofibrant and each is fibrant. In that case, there's a lemma saying that if then that left homotopy can be witnessed by any desired cylinder object for . So if you pick a single cylinder object for and use it for all the homotopies , then you can induce a map and deduce .
Got it, thanks.
And, it's not true in general. For instance in simplicial sets, if is two points and is a path/string of 1-simplices of length , and picks the first vertex of the each path and the last vertex. Then for each but in the product and are actually points in two different connected components, basically because any path in the product has finite length so it's too short to connect the endpoints after projecting to for large .
So you have to do a fibrant replacement before taking infinite products, to get a homotopy invariant construction.
In sSet you don't have to do fibrant replacement to form "finite homotopy products", but in a general model category you could have to.