Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: representably order-reflecting maps


view this post on Zulip Jonas Frey (Dec 27 2020 at 20:41):

A morphism f:ABf:A\to B in a category CC is called monomorphism/monic, if all induced postcomposition maps C(X,A)C(X,B)C(X,A)\to C(X,B) are injective.

Is there an established term for a map f:ABf:A\to B in a locally ordered category CC such that all induced postcomposition maps C(X,A)C(X,B)C(X,A)\to C(X,B) are order-reflecting?

I know that such maps can be called "full", but that's not the kind of analogy I'm looking for since "order-reflecting" as well as "full" are terms in concrete "enriching" categories, and I'm looking for a term for the corresponding "representable" notion in enriched categories.

view this post on Zulip fosco (Jan 01 2021 at 10:42):

Might not be the best terminology, but if F:CDF : {\cal C} \to {\cal D} is a functor of V\cal V-enriched category, and PP a property of morphisms in V\cal V, I tend to call "hom-wise PP" the FF's such that every FXY:hom(X,Y)hom(FX,FY)F_{XY} : \hom(X,Y) \to \hom(FX, FY) is PP.

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 01 2021 at 12:03):

@Jonas Frey Why not call that “pointwise” or “objectwise” order-reflecting? It seems consistent with the use in e.g. “(co)limits of presheaves are computed pointwise/objectwise”.
You identify a morphism in CC with a morphism of (enriched) presheaves on CC via the Yoneda embedding; then “doing things pointwise” means “evaluating the presheaves at each object of CC”. In this case you're saying that f:ABf: A \to B seen as the morphism of presheaves f:C(,A)C(,B)f_*: C(-,A) \to C(-,B) is pointwise order-reflecting.