Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: representably co-ff 1-cells


view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Dec 23 2020 at 22:08):

Is there a name for 1-cells in a bicategory with the dual property to being representably ff? I.e., the property I'm looking for is that restriction along them is fully faithful as a functor between hom-categories.

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Dec 23 2020 at 22:08):

Also, are there nice characterizations of when this occurs? I have some suspicion that it might be related to density/codensity aka adequacy...

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Dec 23 2020 at 22:11):

One primary reason these are of interest to me is that Kan extending along functors p with this property gives rise to adjoint triples Lan_p ⊣ p* ⊣ Ran_p with ff middle entry p*, and these are nice—for example, we get a canonical transformation χ : Ran_p → Lan_p

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Dec 23 2020 at 22:13):

I've noticed that one class of functors with this property are the terminal functors ! : BM → 1 from 1-object categories—in which case the triple above is colim ⊣ Δ ⊣ lim between a category and the category of M-actions in it

view this post on Zulip Alexander Campbell (Dec 24 2020 at 00:52):

An interesting characterisation of the "co-fully-faithful" functors in Cat (see https://mathoverflow.net/a/354097/57405): a functor u ⁣:IJu \colon I \to J is co-fully-faithful if and only if it is "initial for ends", i.e. for any functor F ⁣:Jop×JCF \colon J^{op} \times J \to C, the canonical map jJF(j,j)iIF(u(i),u(i))\int_{j \in J} F(j,j) \to \int_{i \in I} F(u(i),u(i)) is an isomorphism.

view this post on Zulip Alexander Campbell (Dec 24 2020 at 00:55):

In the paper (http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/8/n20/8-20abs.html), these functors are called "lax epimorphisms", and the authors characterise them as the "absolutely dense" functors. They say that a functor u ⁣:IJu \colon I \to J is absolutely dense if each object jJj \in J is the colimit of the canonical diagram u/jJu/j \to J (i.e. uu is dense) and moreover these colimits are absolute (i.e. preserved by all functors out of JJ).

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Dec 24 2020 at 04:23):

tyvm!

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Dec 25 2020 at 07:55):

ah nice, that paper gives another more direct condition in terms of connectedness of some sort of categories of factorizations

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Dec 25 2020 at 07:56):

also, interesting classes of examples: any localization is co-ff, and the terminal morphism ! : C → 1 is co-ff exactly when C is connected

view this post on Zulip Alexander Campbell (Dec 26 2020 at 02:10):

sarahzrf said:

ah nice, that paper gives another more direct condition in terms of connectedness of some sort of categories of factorizations

That condition is another way of stating part 2 of the proposition on "Initiality for ends" in the MO answer to which I linked, where a slick proof is also suggested.