You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Is there a name for 1-cells in a bicategory with the dual property to being representably ff? I.e., the property I'm looking for is that restriction along them is fully faithful as a functor between hom-categories.
Also, are there nice characterizations of when this occurs? I have some suspicion that it might be related to density/codensity aka adequacy...
One primary reason these are of interest to me is that Kan extending along functors p with this property gives rise to adjoint triples Lan_p ⊣ p* ⊣ Ran_p with ff middle entry p*, and these are nice—for example, we get a canonical transformation χ : Ran_p → Lan_p
I've noticed that one class of functors with this property are the terminal functors ! : BM → 1 from 1-object categories—in which case the triple above is colim ⊣ Δ ⊣ lim between a category and the category of M-actions in it
An interesting characterisation of the "co-fully-faithful" functors in Cat (see https://mathoverflow.net/a/354097/57405): a functor is co-fully-faithful if and only if it is "initial for ends", i.e. for any functor , the canonical map is an isomorphism.
In the paper (http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/8/n20/8-20abs.html), these functors are called "lax epimorphisms", and the authors characterise them as the "absolutely dense" functors. They say that a functor is absolutely dense if each object is the colimit of the canonical diagram (i.e. is dense) and moreover these colimits are absolute (i.e. preserved by all functors out of ).
tyvm!
ah nice, that paper gives another more direct condition in terms of connectedness of some sort of categories of factorizations
also, interesting classes of examples: any localization is co-ff, and the terminal morphism ! : C → 1 is co-ff exactly when C is connected
sarahzrf said:
ah nice, that paper gives another more direct condition in terms of connectedness of some sort of categories of factorizations
That condition is another way of stating part 2 of the proposition on "Initiality for ends" in the MO answer to which I linked, where a slick proof is also suggested.