You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Tobias Fritz said:
Ugh, scratch that example! I got confused about the subcategory being full vs only containing morphisms of the form . It should be the former, but then my subcategory isn't triangulated since it's not closed under kernels and cokernels. Then I don't know of an example offhand.
oh I just appreciate that someone tried with me!! I am too can't get an example yet unfortunately
Well, it's been a fun question to think about to refresh my memory on triangulated categories :sweat_smile:
How about the category of even-dimensional vector spaces as a subcategory of all (say finite-dimensional) vector spaces? Given , its mapping cone is the direct sum of the kernel and the cokernel of , and if both and are even-dimensional, then the usual dimension formulas from linear algebra should imply that also its mapping cone is even-dimensional. Therefore we have a triangulated subcategory, but clearly it's not saturated.
Tobias Fritz said:
Well, it's been a fun question to think about to refresh my memory on triangulated categories :sweat_smile:
How about the category of even-dimensional vector spaces as a subcategory of all (say finite-dimensional) vector spaces? Given , its mapping cone is the direct sum of the kernel and the cokernel of , and if both and are even-dimensional, then the usual dimension formulas from linear algebra should imply that also its mapping cone is even-dimensional. Therefore we have a triangulated subcategory, but clearly it's not saturated.
What's the triangulated structure here? Do you want graded vector spaces?
I think if you take graded vector spades which are even dimensionsal in every degree that works, thanks!
Oh are you just thinking take the identity for Σ or something?
Hmm, I don't see how a grading would be relevant; I just had the usual triangulated structure on a semisimple abelian category in mind.
Right, is the identity, I just had started with the most trivial type of example.
Tobias Fritz said:
Hmm, I don't see how a grading would be relevant; I just had the usual triangulated structure on a semisimple abelian category in mind.
Gotcha, I was thinking of the grading because the derived category D(k) is (triangulated) equivalent to the category of graded vector spaces
I forgot what the canonical literature is on this, so forgive me for pointing to Example 8.1 of my own old notes on triangulated categories :wink:
Ah, right! Then that's a more interesting example I guess.
Tobias Fritz said:
Ah, right! Then that's a more interesting example I guess.
Both are good!