You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I'm looking for some guidance/check-my-work on how to go on about proving/disproving the following facts:
For (1) I suspect Theorem 6.9 from Bird's thesis might be useful: it states that a monad of rank on a locally -presentable (V-)category yields a L P category of algebras, and generators are given by free algebras over the generators of . Now should be such a category: for , there is a (finitary afaik) 2-monad whose strict algebras are SMCs.
Also, intuitively (the [[symmetric groupoid]]) and (...something else, I don't really care tbh) still pick out objects and maps of an SMC and thus allow to present it like categories are. However I am a bit confused by cardinalities here, since I don't expect every SMC (or every category...) to be a countable directed colimit of objects and maps... or is small directed colimit enough?
Regarding (2)... Bird's thesis linked above proves V-Loc is closed under a bunch of Cat-limits, among which are products and inserters. I wonder if commas can be built out of those, like pullbacks can be built out of products and equalizers. So the comma of and would be constructed as the inserter of where the top arrow if and the bottom is . This seems to work? And to pick out an object I would map out of , with the assignment , since then though I don't see why should be finite so maybe I'm messing up something (even assuming is finitely presentable doesn't seem to help..?).
I'm on the move, so can't give more details now, but I recommend checking out Bourke's Accessible aspects of 2-category theory, which is about this kind of question.
You’re talking about braided pseudo monoidal functors, Matteo? Generally you’ll need everything strict to get LFP, because for instance with pseudo, there’s no strict initial object—you get to choose coherences for the pseudo-unique map out of the pseudo-initial guy.
Kevin Carlson said:
You’re talking about braided pseudo monoidal functors, Matteo?
Yes
Kevin Carlson said:
Generally you’ll need everything strict to get LFP, because for instance with pseudo, there’s no strict initial object—you get to choose coherences for the pseudo-unique map out of the pseudo-initial guy.
Ah thanks, I missed that subtlety in Bird's theorem---it applies to strict algebras and strict morphisms, of course.
The reference Nathanael pointed to seems extremely relevant
In particular I don't really need locally finitely presentable, accessible + some specific colimits should be enough for my aims
Yes, I was quite impressed to learn that these guys are accessible, a dramatic expansion of the field of play of accessibility \ presentability!
Check Examples 6.3.6 and 6.4.6 in my paper with Axel Osmond "Biaccessible and bipresentable 2-categories". That may provide inspiration.