You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Let be a presheaf on a topological space that is flasque, meaning whenever the restriction map is surjective.
Then is the following true: for all and such that , there exists with and ?
If not, is there a simple counterexample?
Ok, I think this may be a counterexample...
Let be a space generated by the two open sets , so .
Let be defined as follows:
,
,
,
,
.
And the action of on inclusions is by restriction of tuples.
Then take , . Then these agree on restriction to , but we cannot find restricting to both and . Is this correct?
Seems right to me.
I would even go so far as to say , , and