You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
In many categories, every object is a colimit of copies of the terminal object (unless this entire question is mistaken, which is for sure possible). Expanding that a bit, fixing a suitable category : for every object there exists a small category such that is the colimit of the terminal functor .
1) Is there some theory of this process? Under what conditions on can you always do this?
2) Is there ever any sense in which the association is "canonical"? Or are there in general just a whole bunch of unrelated and no way to pick one?
3) How do you go about actually computing these things in practice? Let's say, to pick a random example, that I want to get as a colimit of points in . How would I go about finding a category that does what I want?
Only discrete spaces are colimits of points in Top. I think there are not many categories with this property (if you want them to have all colimits)--maybe just Set and its two localizations. What does happen often is that there is some good way to write objects of C as colimits of a fixed small collection of objects of C.
Jules Hedges said:
(unless this entire question is mistaken, which is for sure possible)
Huh.
Until roughly 2 minutes ago I would have said that every space is a quotient of a discrete space without thinking about it
It is true that every ∞-groupoid is a quotient of discrete set... but that's a different notion of space!
Here's a minimal example. The Sierpinski space (the set {1,2} with the topology {{}, {2}, {1,2}}) I believe does not admit a quotient map from any discrete space.
The quotient of any discrete topological space is again a discrete topological space. I would say the 2-point indiscrete space is the minimal counterexample, but I suppose the Sierpiński space is minimal if you restrict to sober spaces.
Exactly, it's not totally obvious because there are more possible indexing categories than just discrete ones, but you can check that a colimit of discrete spaces is discrete by using the fact that a space is discrete iff any map from it to the discrete space on 2 elements is continuous.
For the original question I guess there are also Kleisli categories of monads on Set that preserve 1, e.g., free convex spaces or spaces of the form ( = the ultrafilter monad)
I've been working recently with categories where every object is a coproduct of points. I was (also mistakenly) thinking that any kleisli category of a monad on is an example of that, although now what I think is actually true is that every object is a coproduct of copies of the free algebra on 1 generator, which is terminal I think exactly when the monad is affine (ie. ). An interesting example is the kleisli category of the finite support probability distribution monad, aka the category of finite support Markov kernels
That's why I've been wondering how to make that kind of trick work in general
Oh yeah these aren't counterexamples to my original guess because these categories lack other colimits--then you could also include examples such as finite sets, or infinite sets, etc.
Well not infinite sets.
Jules Hedges said:
2) Is there ever any sense in which the association is "canonical"? Or are there in general just a whole bunch of unrelated and no way to pick one?
If the inclusion of is a [[dense functor]] then there is by definition a canonical choice.
Jules Hedges said:
In many categories, every object is a colimit of copies of the terminal object (unless this entire question is mistaken, which is for sure possible).
What are some categories like that? I'm having trouble thinking of categories like that, other than Set (and FinSet, and similar categories).
My mental image of a terminal object is a point, and when I take a bunch of points and glue them together however I want, I just get a bunch of points. That is: in my mind's eye, any colimit of terminal objects is just a coproduct of terminal objects, which is just some number of dots - possibly infinite.
There could be categories where taking colimits of terminal objects gives more interesting objects, but I'd like to hear about them!
I'm sure this is not what Jules had in mind, but of course in a higher category one can get interesting things by gluing together points because the glue retains its shape. For instance, is the (homotopy) colimit of the diagram .
John Baez said:
What are some categories like that? I'm having trouble thinking of categories like that, other than Set (and FinSet, and similar categories).
My mental image of a terminal object is a point, and when I take a bunch of points and glue them together however I want, I just get a bunch of points. That is: in my mind's eye, any colimit of terminal objects is just a coproduct of terminal objects, which is just some number of dots - possibly infinite.
I was mistaken, I had in mind things like Top but it's not true. (There are at least some other examples besides Set and similar things, you need to cheat a bit by looking at categories that only have some colimits: for example, the kleisli category of any affine monad on Set has every object being a coproduct of points. But the spirit of what I had in mind was to go beyond examples like that)