You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Is every left adjoint functor from the category of simplicial sets to a cocomplete category the left Kan extension of some functor along the Yoneda embedding? I found this claim in the title (but not in the actual text) of section 4 in this document. The title also seems to claim that there is a unified presentation of all left adjoint functors from the category of simplicial sets to any (not necessarily cocomplete) category (for which I can find no indication whatsoever).
Yes, because left adjoints are cocontinuous, and presheaf categories are [[free cocompletions]].
Thanks, so one just has to precompose with the Yoneda embedding to obtain the desired functor . I think it's a bit surprising that each cocontinuous functor is left adjoint.
Yes, the adjoint functor theorem is a bit magic.
But also, cocontinous functors should be left adjoints, so we're just saying here that nothing horrible happens. Which is of course a bit surprising, but only like
DISASTER DID NOT STRIKE TODAY!!!
(The headline you never see in the paper, because it hasn't happened yet.)
Why "should" cocontinuous functors be left adjoints unless you believe in the adjoint functor theorem?
Also, this is true for any [[total category]].
I believe in the adjoint functor theorem.
I just meant to tell Leopold, who may just be starting to learn about this stuff, that when you see a cocontinuous functor you should expect it to be a left adjoint, because in most situations you come across, it will be.