Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: how to argue quotient maps form a natural transformation?


view this post on Zulip Naso (May 28 2023 at 04:41):

Let F:SetSemiF : \mathcal{Set} \to \mathcal{Semi} be the free semigroup functor.

For any set AA there is a semigroup I(A)I(A) called the 'free semigroup with idempotent generators', which is F(A)/F(A)/\sim where \sim is the smallest congruence containing the pairs (a,aa)(a,aa) for each aAa \in A.

Now for each AA we have a quotient map qA:F(A)I(A)q_A : F(A) \to I(A).

Let Ω:TopSet\Omega : \mathcal{T}^\mathsf{op} \to \mathcal{Set} be a presheaf on a topological space (X,T)(X, \mathcal{T}).

I want to argue that these quotient maps assemble to a natural transformation q:FΩIΩq : F \circ \Omega \to I \circ \Omega.

"It seems obvious" (famous last words) and yet I can't think of a concise way to explain it.

view this post on Zulip John Baez (May 28 2023 at 04:58):

I think that the maps qA:F(A)I(A)q_A : F(A) \to I(A) are components of a natural transformation q:FIq: F \Rightarrow I. (I write natural transformations with a double arrow.) You can then right whisker this natural transformation with the functor Ω\Omega to get a natural transformation qΩ:FΩIΩq \circ \Omega: F \circ \Omega \Rightarrow I\circ \Omega. You are calling this latter natural transformation qq.