You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Smooth brain moment: is the following true for a function ?
Suppose is invertible iff is surjective. Then is injective.
It would help to put quantifiers in as appropriate. I can say that if is a finite set, then it is unconditionally true that for all , is surjective iff is invertible. That doesn't mean that is always injective. But perhaps I misunderstood what is being asked.
I am probably missing something, but the way it's written I understand it as just a formula of the form . This is not provable because it is falsified by taking both and false. For functions, you take to be neither surjective nor injective, so the "iff" hypothesis holds, but not the conclusion. But, again, I may be misunderstanding the statement.
Todd Trimble said:
It would help to put quantifiers in as appropriate. I can say that if is a finite set, then it is unconditionally true that for all , is surjective iff is invertible. That doesn't mean that is always injective. But perhaps I misunderstood what is being asked.
That's a perfect counterexample.
smooth-brains should check out the differential geometry zulip, this is more of an arrow-brain server
too many arrows smoothed my brain :laughing: