Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: equalisers/pullbacks of "global elements", but for mon. cats


view this post on Zulip Emily (Mar 16 2021 at 02:13):

In Sets\mathsf{Sets}, given maps x,y ⁣:ptXx,y\colon\mathrm{pt}\rightrightarrows X with xyx\neq y, we have Eq(x,y)pt×x,X,ypt\mathrm{Eq}(x,y)\cong\mathrm{pt}\times_{x,X,y}\mathrm{pt}\cong\emptyset, where the pullback agrees with the equaliser because pt\mathrm{pt} is terminal in Sets\mathsf{Sets}.

When one passes however to a bicomplete monoidal category (V,,1V)(\mathcal{V},\otimes,\mathbf{1}_\mathcal{V}) and replaces pt\mathrm{pt} with 1V\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{V}} and \emptyset with the initial object V\varnothing_{\mathcal{V}} of V\mathcal{V}, this may not be the case anymore.

Question: Are there nice conditions on V\mathcal{V} forcing this to be the case? I.e., such that, for any pair of maps x,y ⁣:1VVx,y\colon\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{V}}\rightrightarrows V of V\mathcal{V}, we have 1V×x,V,y1VV\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{V}}\times_{x,V,y}\mathbf{1}_\mathcal{V}\cong\varnothing_{\mathcal{V}}?