Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: enrichment of functor categories


view this post on Zulip Jonas Frey (Jul 26 2026 at 00:20):

Given a small category CC and a locally small category XX, is it true that [Cop,X][C^{op},X] always has a canonical enrichment in [Cop,Set][C^{op},Set] given by hom(F,G)(c)=Nat(F/c,G/c)\underline{hom}(F,G)(c) = Nat(F/c,G/c)?, where F/cF/c is the pullback of FF to C/cC/c ? If yes, what's a good reference for that?

I'm vaguely aware that under sufficient co/completeness assumptions on XX we get a situation with related enrichment, tensor, and cotensor structures, but I'm wondering about the enrichment alone.

view this post on Zulip Vincent Moreau (Jul 26 2026 at 19:50):

At least when X=SetX = \operatorname{Set} this looks very much like the content of Exercise 8 of Chapter 1 in Sheaves in Geometry and Logic, about the internal hom of presheaf categories hence self-enrichment, see the screenshot attached:
screenshot attached
It's quite interesting that it may be more general as you describe!