You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Given a small category and a locally small category , is it true that always has a canonical enrichment in given by ?, where is the pullback of to ? If yes, what's a good reference for that?
I'm vaguely aware that under sufficient co/completeness assumptions on we get a situation with related enrichment, tensor, and cotensor structures, but I'm wondering about the enrichment alone.
At least when this looks very much like the content of Exercise 8 of Chapter 1 in Sheaves in Geometry and Logic, about the internal hom of presheaf categories hence self-enrichment, see the screenshot attached:
![]()
It's quite interesting that it may be more general as you describe!