You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I was looking a little at "Duoidal Structures for Compositional Dependence" by Shapiro and Spivak. In that paper, they talk about the idea that a poset can be used to model dependence. Assume we have a poset category . We think of the objects as "events" of some kind, and we put a morphism if must happen before happens.
I was trying to use this formalism to describe a situation that arises in imaging. The idea would be to put a morphism to indicate that making some observations requires that the thing we are looking at satisfy some property as described by . The problem is that most observations are ambiguous - there could be multiple past events describing the nature of the target being imaged that lead to the event of making a particular observation with particular data values.
In this ambiguous situation, I was thinking there would actually be no morphism with target of if was an ambiguous observation. Now that I type this all out, I realize that if we define a "union" of events - defined by being said to happen exactly when at least one of or happens - then there would actually be morphisms with target of . For example, there would need to be a morphism from the union event where each is the presence of a target configuration that could have lead to the observation made, and the union is taken over all such configurations. This is because there was some target present which generated our observations.
I was going to ask how ambiguity could be modelled in this category, but I think the union events can be used to model this. I'll create this post anyways though, in case anyone has something they would like to add on this topic.