Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: braiding and symmetry


view this post on Zulip Asad Saeeduddin (Apr 18 2020 at 14:21):

Is it correct to say that a symmetric monoidal category is a braided monoidal category whose braiding is an involution?

view this post on Zulip James Wood (Apr 18 2020 at 14:23):

nLab seems to say exactly this: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/symmetric+monoidal+category#definition

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Apr 18 2020 at 14:23):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braided_monoidal_category#Symmetric_monoidal_categories

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Apr 18 2020 at 14:24):

It's not literally an involution (except possibly in some parameterized sense) because the indices are different.

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Apr 18 2020 at 14:24):

Otherwise, yes.

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Apr 18 2020 at 16:56):

Due to what Reid points out, I wouldn't say the symmetry is an involution unless I clarified that right away. Might as well just say

By,xBx,y=1xyB_{y,x} B_{x,y} = 1_{x \otimes y}

view this post on Zulip Joe Moeller (Apr 19 2020 at 01:46):

The components might not be involutions, but maybe the natural transformation itself is an involution, no?

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Apr 19 2020 at 01:47):

no, it can't be—it's not an endomorphism

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Apr 19 2020 at 01:48):

it's a transformation from ⊗ to ⊗ ∘ τ, where τ is the swapping functor C × C → C × C

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Apr 19 2020 at 01:49):

to be precise, symmetry says that braiding's inverse is not itself but its own whiskering by τ

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Apr 19 2020 at 01:50):

which is well-typed since τ is an involution

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Apr 19 2020 at 02:14):

So the symmetry is a kind of "quasi-involution" that's riding the involution τ\tau.

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Apr 19 2020 at 02:15):

Here "riding" is one of Jim Dolan's terms for a certain kind of microcosm principle thing...

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Apr 19 2020 at 02:15):

For example if you have 2 monoids in two different monoidal categories, you can have a morphism from one monoid to another riding a monoidal functor from one monoidal category to the other.

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Apr 19 2020 at 02:25):

oooh

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Apr 19 2020 at 02:25):

i like that

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Apr 19 2020 at 02:25):

ive definitely noticed that kind of thing before :eyes:

view this post on Zulip sarahzrf (Apr 19 2020 at 02:25):

nice to have a name for it

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Apr 19 2020 at 03:11):

Yes, I like it.

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Apr 19 2020 at 03:12):

It hasn't really caught on, but we should just start using it - it's pretty clear.