You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
This seems to be the case for Set and any regular ? But what about when the base category is, say, some other locally presentable category? Or a presentable -category?
Monadic over what?
-accessible endofunctors is the obvious choice, but something else nontrivial could also be interesting.
It's true for any locally -presentable category by Lack's On the monadicity of finitary monads. I don't see any reason this would fail for -categories.
Have you looked at Lack's proof and it seems like it should work for -categories? Or do you just mean there's no obvious reason the statement would fail to be true there?
For monadicity over -accessible endofunctors, the full force of Lack's result is not necessary: it suffices to know that categories of monoids in nice monoidal categories are monadic over their base categories. I would suppose that this result has already been established for -categories, but if not it presumably will follow from the work Simon Henry spoke about at CT this year.
Has anybody actually established any monadicity results for the category of algebras of an -operad in an -category other than ? It could very well be in Higher Algebra or Kerodon for all I have a handle on those books, but I don't think I've seen it cited.
I guess there's some stuff in HA section 3.1.3 ... and 4.7.3. After that Lurie moves on to other stuff. He never seems to establish anything like "algebras of operads in presentable -categories are algebras of a monad" though.