Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: What is this factorisation?


view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 26 2024 at 13:47):

Suppose I have a category CC with

for example, CC could be a presheaf topos with the epi-mono factorisation system and the canonical presentation of presheaves as colimits of representables.

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 26 2024 at 13:49):

Given any morphism f:cdf: c \to d, it seems to me that, in this situation, I can obtain a factorisation of ff relative to the presentation of cc, whose second leg is “locally MM”, in the following way:

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 26 2024 at 13:50):

  1. Take the cone fγcf \circ \gamma_c over dd, and factorise each component (at some index jj) into mjejm_j \circ e_j

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 26 2024 at 13:50):

  1. By functoriality of the factorisation, jcod(ej)=dom(mj)j \mapsto \mathrm{cod}(e_j) = \mathrm{dom}(m_j) extends to a diagram, whose shape is the same as the shape of γc\gamma_c: let f(c)f_*(c) be the colimit of this diagram, presented by the cone η\eta.

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 26 2024 at 13:51):

  1. We get a morphism f~:cf(c)\tilde{f}: c \to f_*(c) by universality of γc\gamma_c considering the cone jη(j)ejj \mapsto \eta(j)\circ e_j, and a morphism fl:f(c)df_l: f_*(c) \to d by universality of η\eta considering the cone jmjj \mapsto m_j

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 26 2024 at 13:52):

  1. We have f=flf~f = f_l \circ \tilde{f}.

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 26 2024 at 13:52):

Question is: Have you seen this before? Does it have a name? Does it have nice properties e.g. in the presheaf topos case?

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 26 2024 at 13:58):

One concrete example: take CC to be the presheaf category of reflexive graphs. Then I believe that, for any morphism ff,

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 26 2024 at 14:02):

To give my intuitive understanding of this: f(c)f_*(c) is constructed by “gluing the images through ff of the representables in cc, exactly in the way that they are glued together in cc

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (Jan 26 2024 at 15:22):

Hm, it seems like this wouldn't generally yield an EM factorization system since you could repeat the process on flf_l (there's no guarantee that the cone η\eta is the canonical one for f(c)f_*(c))...

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 26 2024 at 17:40):

Yes, I would not expect that to work in general.

Perhaps I should add that, in the particular example that I am interested into,

so in fact f(c)f_*(c) is, while not literally the canonical cone, in a certain sense 'equivalent' to it (sorry for the vagueness but I'm still figuring this stuff out); and in this case the factorisation does seem to be functorial.

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 26 2024 at 17:43):

But meanwhile, I would be also just happy to have some understanding of how to characterise the “first leg” morphisms of this factorisation. In the example I care about the second leg is really characterised by being “locally MM”, and that fits my intuition about the general construction, but I don't have a good understanding of what the first leg is. It seems like it should belong to EE in any realistic case, but beyond that I don't know.

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 31 2024 at 09:46):

Just as an update.
I have focussed on the case that I was originally interested into, which is the category of posets and closed (i.e. lower set-preserving) order-preserving maps, where each poset PP is “canonically” presented as the colimit of the PP-shaped diagram of embeddings of lower sets of its elements. The OFS is just epi-mono, which in this case is (surjective closed order-preserving map, closed embedding).

In that case, it turns out that this does produce another interesting orthogonal factorisation system:

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 31 2024 at 09:49):

The middle object arising from the factorisation of f:PQf: P \to Q is the colimit of the PP-shaped diagram of images through ff of the lower sets of elements of PP.

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 31 2024 at 09:50):

I'd be curious to know both if this OFS is known, and if it has any interesting version for categories instead of posets!

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 31 2024 at 10:40):

The obvious generalisation of the right class would be functors F:CDF: C \to D which induce equivalences C/xD/FxC/x \to D/Fx on each slice; the obvious generalisation of the middle-object is the Grothendieck construction of the functor CCatC \to \textbf{Cat} sending xx to D/FxD/Fx; not sure what the characterising property of the left class becomes, nor what the "correct" generalisation of closed maps is -- is it full & essentially surjective, or only essentially surjective on all slices?

view this post on Zulip Morgan Rogers (he/him) (Jan 31 2024 at 11:05):

Sounds related to the [[comprehensive factorization system]]?

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 31 2024 at 11:40):

Yes, must be! Discrete fibrations between posets are precisely the local embeddings

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Jan 31 2024 at 11:41):

And I think I can roughly see how upward-connected is equivalent to "final" when a map is also closed...