You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Suppose I have a category with
for example, could be a presheaf topos with the epi-mono factorisation system and the canonical presentation of presheaves as colimits of representables.
Given any morphism , it seems to me that, in this situation, I can obtain a factorisation of relative to the presentation of , whose second leg is “locally ”, in the following way:
Question is: Have you seen this before? Does it have a name? Does it have nice properties e.g. in the presheaf topos case?
One concrete example: take to be the presheaf category of reflexive graphs. Then I believe that, for any morphism ,
To give my intuitive understanding of this: is constructed by “gluing the images through of the representables in , exactly in the way that they are glued together in ”
Hm, it seems like this wouldn't generally yield an EM factorization system since you could repeat the process on (there's no guarantee that the cone is the canonical one for )...
Yes, I would not expect that to work in general.
Perhaps I should add that, in the particular example that I am interested into,
so in fact is, while not literally the canonical cone, in a certain sense 'equivalent' to it (sorry for the vagueness but I'm still figuring this stuff out); and in this case the factorisation does seem to be functorial.
But meanwhile, I would be also just happy to have some understanding of how to characterise the “first leg” morphisms of this factorisation. In the example I care about the second leg is really characterised by being “locally ”, and that fits my intuition about the general construction, but I don't have a good understanding of what the first leg is. It seems like it should belong to in any realistic case, but beyond that I don't know.
Just as an update.
I have focussed on the case that I was originally interested into, which is the category of posets and closed (i.e. lower set-preserving) order-preserving maps, where each poset is “canonically” presented as the colimit of the -shaped diagram of embeddings of lower sets of its elements. The OFS is just epi-mono, which in this case is (surjective closed order-preserving map, closed embedding).
In that case, it turns out that this does produce another interesting orthogonal factorisation system:
The middle object arising from the factorisation of is the colimit of the -shaped diagram of images through of the lower sets of elements of .
I'd be curious to know both if this OFS is known, and if it has any interesting version for categories instead of posets!
The obvious generalisation of the right class would be functors which induce equivalences on each slice; the obvious generalisation of the middle-object is the Grothendieck construction of the functor sending to ; not sure what the characterising property of the left class becomes, nor what the "correct" generalisation of closed maps is -- is it full & essentially surjective, or only essentially surjective on all slices?
Sounds related to the [[comprehensive factorization system]]?
Yes, must be! Discrete fibrations between posets are precisely the local embeddings
And I think I can roughly see how upward-connected is equivalent to "final" when a map is also closed...