You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I don't know if this is a naive question, or if it even makes sense. In a 2-category, the comma objects determine the 2-morphisms in the category (this is just their UMP). In Cat, the natural transformations are determined by the walking arrow which is a join and hence a particular kind of co-comma object . This is obviously reminiscent of the fact that is strong generator in Set. Is there anyway to make sense of this? For example, what implications does it have on the internal logic of the 2-category?
It's true that 1 is a strong generator in Cat in a 2-categorical sense, i.e. if induces an equivalence of hom-categories then is an equivalence.